Deep State Q-laid

I consider Qanon the cutting edge tension in our overly-sensationalized and adrenalized, hyper-partisan society. Is that a compliment?
 
How can a group of crazy conspiracists become so popular?
 
I have included a couple of full length news segments in this video without edit to show the extent of the corporate production values used to promote this right wing lunatic fringe movement, as news.
 
This topic proves the ringmaster of our national circus is money.
 
Massive grassroots industries of conspiracy were motivated for truth about the JFK and 911 conspiracies, but were blacklisted as persona-non-grata by corporate media. Comparatively, news about Qanon and their crazy allegations are in constant broadcast rotation. Their marketshare is rising faster than rock star stocks at a taxpayer bailout party.
 
The synergy and collusion of corporate sponsorship of Qanon is self-evident, yet its purpose is still murky and confusing, for some.
 
To help understand the deep state conspiracy, consider that the government has been overthrown by a coalition of special interest groups, foreign and domestic, called the deep state..
 
Qanon works for them. The loyalty is to the deep state. If Q calls it the Cabal. Q serves the Cabal.

 
I don’t believe the Q narrative to be true.
 
Covert intentions manipulate our corridors of power and public policy for deep state self interest. That’s the problem. A political solution is an overt plan of democratic action to correct the problem.

Political problem versus political solution.
 
There are at least two sides doing battle for control of our divided government. There is the corrupt on one side and the confused on the other, imo.
 
The corrupt have been recruiting the confused for a very long time. The balance is heavily skewed now because money is plentiful. The corrupt have monopolized our government and the confused are rewarded to concede their resistance, which they do, to the republicans.

Better confused than corrupt is what a good democrat would say.
 
Both parties have neglected the truth in service to the deep state.
 
Funny how conspiracy theories are partisan. The left blames the right and the right blames the left and together they just never seem to figure out how to find the truth.
 
We’ll never know, they say.
 
So move along. Nothing to see here.
 
Then you hear a nonpartisan murmur that reminds you, “it was the deep state”. Oh yes, that’s right. It was the deep state, right?
 
Check your perimeter before proceeding;
 
The deep state killed JFK. The story goes.
 
Once your group kills the president of the most powerful nation on earth, you don’t sit back and say, oh, glad that’s over with. No way, every decision you make from then on must be to serve the overthrow and protect the conspiracy.
 
Failure of democracy would be success for the conspiracy.
 
If the deep state controlled the government, what would they do? I’m sure it would be the same as what was done, and what is still being done.
 
Our government shipped our jobs overseas, imported foreign labor, and created massive inequality. They started an endless war economy for investor profits and maximized our public debt. 
 
What else would you do?
 
They hired an army of propaganda professionals to preach the lone gunman theory and the magic bullet theory on prime time, while demonizing counterpoints of testimony and logic, as conspiracy theory for decades.
 
The official theory is a ridiculous theory that collapses quickly with an honest look. Willful ignorance and official denial provide a thin veil of doubt for those who prefer to remain unsure.
 
Our economy has been captured, and it is being extracted by the deep state. The deep state is the monolithic conspiracy that JFK warned about. They have an army of flag-less mercenaries loyal to their paychecks ready to deploy as necessary, to sow chaos at home and abroad, wherever it might be needed.
 
The deep state is a globalized coalition of corrupt corporations and privatized fascist power. They control the government and extract wealth from the public. They prevent democratic reforms and representative government.
 
But business is good in crazy town. Take a deep breath before you put your head down this rabbit hole. I just got back. I had to come up for air. I saw enough to know I saw enough. I get it.

Sorry to say, but I have concluded that this Q thing is the craziest bunch of psycho stink you could ever smell.

If thoughts had aroma, this stuff would be putrid.
 
The Q “conspiracy” is an insult to conspiracy. Q is a tactic to discredit conspiracy, and make a mockery of truth seeking. It’s a scam.
 
Q: Why is this conspiracy so popular?
 
A: Qanon in a way, is like the modern day equivalent of the old Enquirer magazine. They discredit information by association. If they publish something, you know it’s not true. Which is deceptive, but fun.

 
You can discredit an article about corruption by surrounding it with UFO articles, which you might have done, or do, if you were corrupt and owned a newspaper.
 
The “unofficial” JFK assassination investigations were discredited for decades, as conspiracy, published next to stories about alien abductions and Elvis sightings, and a little boy with bat ears.
 
Back then, the news hour shows would tease assassination stories for maximum commercial impact. We would wait for an hour and then they would run a thirty second blurb of irrelevant drama at the end of the show.
 
Whatever the info was it could always be dismissed with the wave of an official hand. Or willful ignorance was popular and effective back then too, as it is now.
 
The same tactics are still used to discredit “theories” that diverge from the official “version” of political crimes. This way “officials” don’t have to be accountable for their complicity, wether it be by guilt or ignorance, as they grandfather in their inherited cover-up stories, as implausible as they might be.
 
The status quo defends the official theories, even if untrue.
 
Conspiracies become theories when the official investigation is inadequate. This would naturally happen if officials were guilty of the underlying crime, or protecting their own complicity by obstructing investigations to prevent justice.

Conspiracies happen. Obstruction causes theories.
 
Demonizing conspiracy is an obstruction tactic to rubber stamp an establishment sanctioned cover-up.
 
Without a reliable consensus system, the only dissenting voice the public has is by marching in the streets, to protest the decisions of those they have elected to represent them.
 
Eventually the public concedes in protest fatigue. They become unrepresented and victimized by those they vote for, those who create the policy that increases the inequality and injustice. The public is then compelled to protest again and again.
 
By my understanding, Q is not protesting anything. Together with their mainstream brethren in the propaganda industry, they actually demonize conspiracy and minimize the importance of the truth. They are not about to protest the conflict-based economy, they are here to protect it.
 
Q is the opposite of their claims.
 
Straw man conspiracy theories are concocted to be easily refuted in order to discredit other conspiracies by association.

False equivalency
 
An example would be discrediting birtherism, with an argument, and then casually throw the truth movement into your imaginary ‘defeated’ pile without debate.

Presumptuous and arrogant tool comes to mind. I don’t want to be too judgmental but conspiracy theories are not created equal and should not be treated as such by credible people.

The tv people use the same tactics routinely, to pretend they have debunked an unofficial conspiracy theory, when they haven’t.
 
Another bad tactic is blaming the news consumers for their lack of faith in an official theory as being a personal flaw. What a totally twisted self-serving logic. As if there’s no conspiracy simply because we need there to be one, for peace of mind, they say, while ignoring the questions that might lead to the truth and the metaphorical smoking gun in their hand.
 
Notice how Farheed gains “official” credibility by discrediting the obviously fictional beliefs of Qanon. Now you can trust him when he starts lying to you on his conspiracy show. That’d be propaganda. 95% proof, I mean truth. He says, “look over here”, at the straw-man and everybody does.
 
The crazy straw man conspiracy theories are easily debunked to give pundits credibility, to convince you that they don’t work for the conspirators, while testifying to the validity of their “official” theories.
 
Deceptive propaganda distracts you from the main point and from coming to the right conclusion. You will agree with everything presented and then assume the conclusion must also be correct, when it’s not.

 
The propaganda is designed to persuade you to act against your own best interest. For example, the guilty arresting a patsy to take the blame. You consider the case closed, though the convicted was “framed”.
 
Those who hide evidence that would lead to the truth are also guilty or complicit of the underlying crime. History shows the motive for obstruction of justice is to hide guilt, which will become a conspiracy theory if it is the authority that obstructs the investigation.
 
Authority does not deserve the benefit of the doubt, anymore. That’s how we got to the point of Qanon and conspiracy trivialization. That’s how Qanon is an authority, or not, depending what you believe.
 
Now, in the Q narrative, we are to believe, or not, that a spook with high level security clearance is leaking clues to his “followers”.

We are to believe that this is a deep state mole and betrayal conspiracy narrative, as opposed to Q being a tool in a deep state operation, serving its partisan purposes, as usual.
 
The deep state can’t stop the Q? I’m so sure. Not credible. This is a deep state conspiracy synergistically promoted through the media to normalize the lunacy on our path to the national demise.

Qanon followers seek the truth, supposedly, yet somehow they can’t seem to find it. So, they’ll just believe a bunch of idiotic nonsense, supposedly. They are an intellectual nuisance to the truth and yet still get a free ride on the cable news propaganda train, like some kind of elitist hobos of disinformation, spreading their seeds of deception to grow among the gullible masses.
 
I don’t need any more proof to know that they are an un-organic movement with an ulterior motive, which is to discredit the truth.

They pretend to be non-partisan but they are republicans in service to the ideological division and the economic injustice.
 
The main fallacy of the Q narrative, by pundits left and right, is to suggest that Trump is a rouge populist and not the continuation of previous republican administration agendas, which he is, and so is Qanon. The continuity of the division has been relentless.

 
The resistance has been irrelevant.
 
A lot of people believe Q, apparently, despite the blatant lies and ridiculous predictions. They believe, not because the lies are plausible but, as an act of faith, in allegiance against their common adversaries.
 
Choose your slur here.
 
The enemy is simplistically labeled as socialists, leftists, democrats, and the like, by their leader, our president, and branded as child molesters by his unfiltered followers, the deep state shills pretending to be non-partisan patriots.
 
Qanon is institutionalized Academentia, magnified to cartoonish absurdity in an attempt to normalize the mockery of the truth, and to diminish its significance in our society.
 
Qanon is not seeking the truth. They are seeking those who know the truth. The truth is Qanon are mercenary spies in a socially subsidized honey pot operation, commissioned by the deep state to prevent the so-called socialists from influencing policy.
 
Antifa is Q’s mercenary enemy in this narrative. Antifa is simply a different department in the same haunted house of spooks and spies, concocted for battle, like political parties, but designated nonpartisan to comply with the Hatch act.
 
The alleged ideological enemies are preparing to convene for violence, for the cameras. Like actors on a little set, they assemble to escalate the conflict for broadcast. That’s what they’re paid to do, perform the violence for the narrative.
 
You start to see how this conflict is being concocted, by nurturing the divisions of idiotic ideologies and investing in conflict in order to perpetuate the privileged industries of an obsolete economy.
 
This economy is designed for conflict and extraction.
 
The public will fight because our economy is designed to profit investors when we do. Our public policy is controlled by investors who profit from conflict and debt. The more we fight the more we spend. The more we spend the more they make.
 
Conflict causes inequality.
 
The workers and the fighters bust their ass. We spend our hard earned money on fighting each other so investors can profit from our blood and toil. It’s an extraction scam that should be corrected.
 
That is the conflict-based economy.
 
The Q-laid crew are here to oppose those who oppose conflict-based profits. The conflict-based economy feeds on the violence for growth, so violence will be provoked, for profits, by the professionals, like Q.
 
The people of the world are emerging from the dark ages due to the digital revolution. We can now see globally and historically and do it instantly, if we want. If one cares to look, it’s easy to see how messed up the people of this planet have been, and still are.
 
We need a democratic upgrade. This place is so frantically antidemocratic, we don’t even have the software yet, for consensus, let alone the need to upgrade it.
 
Think about it.
 
Now is the time to utilize technology for democracy instead of extraction. Now is the time to redesign our economy to provide the citizenry with universal guarantees worthy of a modern day democratic republic. Now is the time.
 
Liberation is more affordable than oppression, for the taxpayers.
 
And for the conflict mongering Q-balls out there.
 
The JFK assassination was investigated by the guy that JFK had just fired. What else do you need to know? The truth is out there if anybody cares to look, most don’t.
 
There’s a fine line between a trump supporter and a Q-laid drinker. After you drink the Q-laid the truth can only be a quest, it’s never a conclusion. That way you can believe anything you want and fit right in with Qanon, as long as you have faith in their plan.
 
Their truth is still pending…
 
Here’s some clue drops for all you Q-tards out there. The enemy is a what, not a who. It doesn’t matter who the enemy is. The result is the same and so is the remedy. The enemy is corruption and the remedy is democracy. Your quest is to understand that in order to put the truth into context, just in case you find some.
 
We need a government to correct the corruption, not protect it.
 
Resistance to a better democracy is corruption. 
 
The political challenge the public faces, to save its democracy, is not in the streets. It’s in the plan. And the apportionment act is a political plan that can create a democracy for the public, at long last.
 
To create a democracy or not, is the question that should be on the table. That’s the choice. Rounding up leftists to fulfill an apocalyptic authoritarian zombie fantasy is not on the table, though duly noted as your preference.
 
Q is against democracy.
 
Marching around against a bunch of conspiracy crap is a marketing ploy. It’s not a protest at all. They incite violence at protests. That’s what Q is doing, tainting peaceful protests so they can be reported as violent.
 
Q is obviously a corporate product, like the tea-tards, but with cooler graphics and a more sensationalistic grievance. It’s all the same, just a little more crazy and dangerous to keep up with the narrative.
 
Qanon mocks protest. Qanon mocks the truth.
 
The true Qanon motive goes unchallenged on corporate news. As if they are just the next cutting edge of free market cynicism to be monetized. They are the commercially acceptable anarchists of conspiracy, come to help officials demonize the unofficial truth as crazy, meaningless, and irrelevant. News at 11. They’ll tell you all about it.
 
It is being reported that Amazon is supposedly “inadvertently” providing featured status to their Q book. And then Twitter bans Q accounts in a publicity stunt to further promote their artificially inflated numbers, and “message”. The privileged presence exposes their allegiance and subservience to their corporate “deep state” overlords.
 
The deep state corporate media news pundits will be keeping us overly-informed about the groups antics and recruitment strategies moving forward, I’m sure. We’ll be seeing a lot more of them. Because they are the same, even if they don’t understand how.
 
Q is a deep state ploy. It is not an organic movement of like-minded people attempting to do something constructive. It is the institutional farming of angry pawns who are mad at the government, and rightly so, and the cable news narrative which is written to profit from conflict.
 
The plan seems to be working.
 
I am not going to dignify the Q theories with further comment, except to say some of it is professionally thoughtful entertainment, as all good fiction is. I consumed enough to know it is not a quest for the truth or a battle with the deep state from within the deep state.
 
Q is a nefarious deep state plot.
 
Amazon and Wall Street are the global deep state. They are the economy created for investors to maximize the extraction of workers. It is a deep state economic design based on exploitation and taxpayer extraction, for some, to create wealth for others.
 
That is the conflict-based economy. It needs to change.
 
Q represents Top Secret America run amuck. They are what president Eisenhower warned us about, speaking of the military industrial complex. They are a vast network of contractors paid to prevent exactly what they are. They are a mercenary organization that undermines truth, justice, and democracy, and the rule of law, and apple pie too, probably. They should be recognized for what they are, servants of fascism, and undeniably dangerous to democracy and the rule of law.
 
I’m not done with Q. Their meteoric rise to infamy is just beginning. I saw report of a scuffle at a protest and the camera zooms in on this super cool sniper Q logo on the back of some guys jacket. I saw the clue and for moment I almost felt like I was part of the team, how fun!
 
Except it’s not.
 
Q represents the commercialization of the coming lawlessness. Qanon is the normalization of the banana republic syndrome where hooligans are here to help enforce law and order, but provoke violence, for money, pretending to be patriots, if you know what I mean.
 
 
————–
 
If you seek the truth to better understand current events and the divisions increasing in our society consider the following;
 
The struggle of humanity is toward either an organization by corruption or representation by democracy.
 
We should assume that corruption has infiltrated nearly every aspect of our government. It is our normal. Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there.
 
The public is adversely influenced by propaganda, as well, that normalizes our current socioeconomic scam as being acceptable, when it’s not. It never was.
 
The system itself is designed for the dark ages, or at best the Cold War. It’s totally out of date with protests increasing as fast as the inequality, with the homeless population about to explode.
 
Anyway, consider China and Russia, are trending very undemocratic, as are we, especially the republicans. We need to reverse that trend here for ourselves before we can preach democracy abroad.
 
The democrats are the only hope of resistance to the globalist authoritarian trend. They are clearly the lesser of two evils so given that’s the only choice, the choice is simple.
 
If we educate democrats to advocate for a new apportionment act to update our democracy for a more representative government,  eventually democrats can succeed, maybe even with bipartisan support.
 
Currently the republicans are shamelessly allied economically with the adversaries of democracy. They are the opposition. They have no allegiance to democracy, at all. At least not now.
 
Consider the democrats have split allegiances, as do we all. But we don’t make public policy. We should expect all democrats to better understand the struggle of humanity and the importance of democracy, and vote accordingly. We should expect they would all prefer to cede some legislative percentage to a larger delegation than to see democracy neutered by an imperial authority.
 
The era of the “moderate” democrats should be ended, imo. Democrats need to step up and acknowledge that money is representation and representatives should be apportioned accordingly. It’s the least they can do, for adequate reform.
 
As the understanding of the plan to reform democracy spreads the democrats will grow along with expectations that will eventually manifest as legislation and an economically representative government.
 
And a final thought about the video post. I must thank Van Helsing, for the images and sound. They are one of my favorite moods for the horror story of our forgotten history, as reported, past and present.
 

 

 

Tyranny

Funny thing about government is their proclamations of law are meaningless unless they control the authority necessary to enforce them.
 
What if Trump loses and refuses to vacate the premises?

 
Why would Trump leave the White House even if he lost? Who are the democrats gonna call? The ghost busters? Or their stock brokers?

 
Are the democrats going to call their deep state allies to escort the defeated squatter from the White House? By force? While he’s surrounded by his team of authoritarian lawyers threatening personal repercussions against everybody?
 
Not likely.
 
Should we expect a stand-off and a shoot-out?
 
If we continue with the same plot line that got us to this point, on the path to tyranny, we should expect the dems to protest and concede. Without an enforcement agency that’s all they can do.
 
Fascism and enforcement are synonymous. Trump and the Republican Party are the fascists. They are the enforcement. They can dictate the policy. The democrats will comply.
 
We have reached a point of puppetry and cartoonish plot lines with this narrative. Our electoral system is antiquated because elected officials prevent the democratic reforms necessary to correct the problem.
 
The dysfunction has been intentional and the result was predictable. As if constraining the “system” to institutional prosperity and trickle down economics wasn’t going to backfire someday, in extreme divisions of nepotistic inequality, rivaling monarchial royalty.
 
Tyranny will be rubber-stamped by a partisan court. The democrats will rely on the opinion of the “branch” that stole the election from VP Gore and anointed king GW. What choice do they have?
 
Partisan lawyers will defend the theft of our lawful representation, just like they rationalized torture to be legal, or slavery. That’s what they get paid for. That’s why they get the big bucks.
 
Nobody will believe them but nobody can stop them. They will dictate policy, because they can. They control the enforcement. When democracy has been corrupted for special interest purposes those who control the government can dictate the policy.
 
“Amazing” the media pundits will say, “Can you believe it?” Turns out we’re not a democracy after all. Or we are, it’s just tied up in the court right now. So we’ll have to wait and see what happens, they’ll say, reporting on the undeclared coup.
 
We can always go back to a democracy, someday, they’ll say, as they narrate the national demise. I can predict the rationalizations already.
 
“Democracy can be messy.”
 
It wasn’t really a democracy anyway, so we’re not really losing that much, they’ll say. Looters don’t deserve to vote, or, “They don’t even know what they’re protesting.”
 
“Stop complaining”, they’ll say. “You deserved it.”
 
Timothy Snyder has written a couple of books to help understand the transition to a tyrannical form of government. I recommend buying them if you want to follow along, looking for clues.
 
If there is a better political solution to tyranny than restoring the middle class with an income-based apportionment act, I would love to see it.
 
Otherwise we’ll assume you prefer tyranny.
 
I think enough counterfeiting and bribery has gone on here that the majority of voters will vote to do away with voting. At least they’ll report it that way. It’s no big deal, they’ll say you said.
 
Democracy is a big deal.
 
The resistance to tyranny succeeds when the enforcement authority is controlled by a representative government, elected democratically.
 
When a special interest organization controls the government for its own purposes, don’t be surprised when they use their enforcement authority against the public to preserve that authority.
 
We are at the crossroads to tyranny. Either we will upgrade our democracy to achieve a more representative government or we will submit to tyranny.
 
The ability to achieve a verifiable and accessible voting system is long overdue. Not having one is the reason we have a dysfunctional democracy, and why we have a president Trump reserving judgement on the validity of our electoral results.
 
The electoral system is intentionally inadequate. It will be easy to argue the results are based on faith, because they are. It’s long past due to fix our democracy.
 
The remedy for tyranny is democracy.
 

The Sheep

This interview is a great example of lizard speak. There’s a lot of words going on with very little being said, unless of course you know how to parse it properly.

The unquestioned and little understood competencies of the financial services industries stand as beacons of human ingenuity and progress towards scamming others.
 
Fine tuned with the best technology for maximum wealth extraction, the investors have created a high tech casino where anybody with some extra money can place a bet.
 
Like gambling, “trading” is a huge industry full of scammers and suckers. It’s a game where you can buy and sell fluctuating values. Buy low, sell high, repeat. You’ll make a fortune.
 
The lizard says it’s easy these days. You just watch for people’s pain and pick up the pieces. It’s sounds a little like a vulture to me, but this lizard prefers to be called a wolf. He’s a hunter not a scavenger.
 
Lizard language can be tricky.
 
The common perception when trading stocks is there is a winner and a loser in every transaction. The wolf eat the sheep for dinner, the saying goes. The wolf is the winner and the sheep is the loser.
 
The wolf gets the sheep’s money, fair and square.
 
The confusion in this interview is the lizard wolf doesn’t want to talk about all the money the government is injecting in the markets. The lizards pretend they are against that.
 
He doesn’t want to talk about taxpayer extraction, but the persistent questioning unleashes some rambling jaw-flapping from the lizard, trying to avoid the unavoidable truth.
 
The unavoidable truth is that the corporate lizards corrupt our government into the taxpayer extraction scam. They are the same team. The government is dysfunctional in his opinion, even though it’s making him, and the corporate lizard elite, tons of money.
 
We can only guess what the lizard meant by calling the government dysfunctional but the conversation was about printing money, to reward over-speculated profiteering by him and those with “capital”, at the expense of others.
 
Government “dysfunction” is intentional.
 
Lizards cry their crocodile tears all the way to the bank. The same bank being surrounded by tents full of homeless people because of the giant extraction scam. The lizards think homeless people are lazy, and should look for work. They understand the moral hazard of a handout.
 
They never have to see the people’s pain because their profits of extraction are electronic, and automatic, and arguably unjustified.
 
The lizards take no responsibility for the public dysfunction. People’s pain is their own fault, they’ll say, or the government’s fault, but not theirs. Even though Inequality is maximized to favor them, by law, the lizards don’t see a connection.
 
“Who are the sheep?” Asks the interviewer.
 
The lizard obfuscates. He goes right to the idea that hedge funds are the victims, without considering the taxpayers, like any big shot lizard would. They believe their money comes from the Fed. Theirs is a business model of harvesting wealth from a system of irrational exuberance made legal, fueled by the faith that the taxpayers will “backstop” their over-speculated profits.
 
Hedge funds are their world.
 
The truth is the money comes from the taxpayers. The taxpayers are the sheep. The taxpayer bailouts are the hedge now. The public guarantees lizard prosperity with bailouts and other extraction strategies, so why would lizards need to hedge their bets? Free at last, free at last!
 
Give yourself a raise!
 
The hedge now is a taxpayer guaranteed injection of a no limit no interest loan from the Fed, if their friends need it, to cover their bad bets. It’s like borrowing money to pay your bills, over and over, forever, and never having to pay it back.
 
Too bad the scam doesn’t work for the sheep.
 
It’s bizarre listening to the lizard rationalize the Fed as the remedy to government dysfunction, as if they are actually independent of each other. They are the same. They have a mutually beneficial arrangement of overcompensation.
 
And finally, you can really detect the depths of indoctrination as the lizard praises GW for telling Paulson to do what needs to be done back in the great scamming of 2008.
 
That’s why this lizard gets the big bucks, no doubt. With analysis like that who needs the truth. Just do what needs to be done, he says. Whatever that means, he didn’t say. But we know.
 
On behalf of the lizard elite everywhere, GW smashed a big money funnel into our treasury and normalized the draining of our nations wealth into their privatized, lizard-like pockets.

Major Frankenstein

Frankenstein represents the bits and pieces of old news stitched together for resurrection in this video; the looting, the unregulated voting machines, Putin the Q, the deep state, Bush selling the scam, and the scam being normalized through regulatory negligence.
 
Dr. Frankenstein is a perfect metaphor for the establishment. They have created the monster they can no longer control. The fake news pundits would have you believe this all started with Trump, which is ridiculous. They’ve been building this monster for decades.
 
Major Frankenstein, as referred to in the video, is a deeper and darker dive into the history of the modern day monster that, as I write, is provoking protestors in Portland, and being deployed to Chicago.
 
Trump’s team is the metaphorical monster in this narrative. The doctor is the previous administrations, who have all spent the past five decades doing their part in building this authoritarian thing that now threatens our democracy, or what’s left of it.
 
The Trump crew simply fired the middlemen, by election, rigged or not. The political establishment that served him so well for so many decades was no longer needed. The monster roams free now, ransacking the country as angry protestors assemble to escelate the conflict.
 
You know how the story goes.
 
I think the video is self-explanatory but I’ll note a few comments here, just in case.
 
Look for GW selling capitalism as it failed. There couldn’t be a better example of complete disconnect between words and reality, except maybe when his father said we were going to war with Iraq to save democracy for Kuwait, the monarchy that is, if you recall.
 
Bush says, “Though economic reforms are necessary, the solution to our problem is sustained economic growth, from free markets.”
 
Meaning, the free market, having just failed requiring a taxpayer bailout, because it’s a scam, was a success. That’s how it works. The solution, according to him, is more of the same. That’s not reform. That’s the same old scam being sold as a solution, as it fails. It’s business as usual, sold with a shameless smirking face.
 
We need smarter government, he says, after being in charge of ours for eight long years. The irony of his failed leadership being self-critiqued as stupid goes right over his head, apparently.
 
Or, he knows he’s a duplicitous tool proud to celebrate the failure of the free market for investor profits. He and his audience know they have just scammed the public for trillions of dollars.
 
The corporate lizard elite applaud the market “failure” and the successful bailout. It’s one transaction, guaranteed by the taxpayer, as Bush said, some thought, implying they would have been wrong, when in reality they were right. It is Orwellian lizard speak. It can be tricky to parse if you’re new here.
 
The obvious but ignored contradiction in logic boggles the mind. Using taxpayer money to bailout capitalism is not capitalism at all. Like calling a monarchy a democracy, it’s a blatant lie that gets applause because the truth doesn’t matter, money does.
 
The truth goes without saying.
 
Capitalism doesn’t work. That’s why our government is broke and printing money for “economic growth”. It’s an absurd failure, yet still defended as a “success”.
 
The public treasury has been looted from inside and out by public policy. It was all legal more or less, they would say, I’m sure. It doesn’t matter who did it. Who didn’t? The result is the same and so is the remedy.
 
Lou nails the big news. We give money to foreign banks who turnaround and buy American assets with it. The scams don’t get much more simple, or blatant than that, but there it is. As if it is “normal”.
 
Like our elections. Funny how the pundits always focus on “voter fraud”. The problem is not voter fraud, Farheed. The problem is electoral fraud. We have an antiquated electoral system and that’s the government’s fault. It’s not a conspiracy. It’s a problem that needs to be fixed with an investment in democracy and electoral infrastructure.
 
And finally, Madoff and Markopolis. It’s the story of the lone scammer and the blind lawman, if you can believe that, who ignored the whistle-blower for over a decade. It’s a work of fiction with an inescapabe truth. The collusion and corruption are self-evident.
 
The markets are a Ponzi scheme where the underlying value of assets, if any, are hyper-inflated, cyclically, to maximize profits for investors, guaranteed by the taxpayers. In other words, it’s an extraction scam.
 
What say you?
 

The Slave Trade

Centuries of institutionalized slavery is proof enough that law and order can be misused by some to extract profits from others. When that happens, and it always does, enforcing law and order becomes an act of self-preservation, to protect and defend the privileged economic order of the establishment by preventing democracy and a peaceful political succession to a more representative government.
 
Slavery is illegal now. So in our so-called civilized society, inequality is maximized as a substitute, which creates an adversary and, without correction, conflict becomes unavoidable, and the slaves revolt, as expected, validating the need for more law and order.
 
When laws are written for unethical profits, permitting slavery for instance, they deserve to be criticized, and broken, until they are corrected and enforced for ethical compliance.
 
The slave trade as described by Marcus Rediker is a horrifying history of what people will do to others for profits. History is full of examples of terror and treachery and institutional betrayal, for profit.
 
Why would we think that’s changed?
 
Philosophically simplified here, and condensed for efficient literary consumption, consider the political spectrum to be freedom on one side and slavery on the other.
 
Freedom can be described as self representation with comparative choice. Slavery is exactly the opposite of that. A slave has no comparative choice, or self-representation.
 
That’s why citizenship of the nation state is so unique and important, comparatively. It’s an attempt to emancipate everybody based on geography, and democracy, and representation.
 
Money is representation now. Without money you are a slave to your needs. You are dependent on those who control your resources. You are at the mercy of their ethical benevolence almost as if they owned you, legally or not.
 
Slavery and freedom can be measured in amounts of wealth. They are not merely abstract terms of philosophical pontification. In our current monetary system, degrees of freedom can be quantified mathematically based on the amount of money people have.
 
Slavery is inequality maximized. Corporations exist to maximize profits for their shareholders, which results in maximizing inequality, which motivates markets to tolerate and even advocate, slavery.
 
Corporations facilitate slavery by exclusion.
 
The government subsidizing corporations and investors enslaves those who are not subsidized, comparatively. The enslavement is by overcompensating some and depriving others. The corporatizing of the the middle class has created two distinct competing classes.
 
One class squeezes the other for profits. Guess which one.
 
The uninvested taxpaying workers are forced into a constant money chase compared to those who are invested in the publicly subsidized corporate markets.
 
Institutional slavery is not motivated by racism, it’s about profits and privilege. Of all the despicable things people have done for profit, declaring ownership of others is about the worst.
 
Owning people is illegal now.
 
You don’t have to own somebody to enslave them. You just need to control their resources. That’s how we do it now. It’s “normal”.
 
Institutional slavery is achieved nowadays by inequality, by depriving people of an adequate income and necessary resources like a home, or a job, health and education.
 
All of which should be human rights, imo.
 
Globalism is a perfect example of resource control to maximize profits for investors. The byproduct of globalism is maximized inequality and therefore institutional slavery. It’s just a matter of degree.
 
The degree of inequality, like slavery, is a political choice.
 
Everything that can be made in America should be made in America, as a rule, and all imports regulated with tariffs to protect domestic commerce, to correct the institutionalized slavery that we have here.
 
Global trade and investment enables the extraction scam.
 
A never ending stream of IPO’s will attempt to eventually corporatize all commerce, to extract investor profits from as many transactions as possible. Corporations will monopolize commerce, if allowed, by using previously speculated profits to buy out Main Street, completely.
 
Which is a bad thing.
 
Investor profits equate to higher prices for consumers and lower wages for workers, not to mention higher inflation and taxes for everybody. The increasing inequality is by design and needs to be corrected to prevent the national demise.
 
The extraction scam happens on Wall Street, not Main Street.
 
Extracting profits from the public occurs in the “markets”, where money keeps making more money despite the ugly indicators of inequality and the ever increasing public debt.
 
The scam wouldn’t work if there was an honest sheriff in town protecting the taxpayers. But the sheriffs around here are all heavily invested in the scam, apparently. Who isn’t?
 
Market profits and public debt rise in tandem. They are the same transaction. Investing has become an extraction scam that siphons wealth from the public to profit investors with taxpayer money.
 
Private profits from the extraction scam create the public debt and make massive inequality the norm. The public is broke.
 
The reconciliation is self evident.
 
Investors will argue that the tax-extraction/subsidized-market scam is not a scam, but it is. Our entire “financial system” needs to be corrected to serve the common good, because it doesn’t.
 
Then you say, “But that’s my money, not yours.”
 
Then they say “All fortunes are part of the much larger historical crime of slavery and reparations are due.”
 
Then I say, yes that’s true. It’s all true.
 
What to do, what to do?
 
The solution is the health-based economy.
 
The more inequality you have the more law enforcement you need. The division is ultimately used to suppress democracy, proving that inequality is a political strategy being used to suppress democracy.
 
The logical conclusion and solution therefore would be to prevent poverty to reduce inequality and conflict. Give the people what they need and stop funding the division. It is the right thing to do.
 
Slavery was made illegal because people could see it. Slavery is much different now that “economic institutions” have been corporatized and globalized, and have been subsidized to enslave those who are not “invested” in the scam. It’s very clever. You can only see it if you look.
 

The Balance Sheet

Two main points for those who are in a hurry. If the stock market wasn’t a scam, it wouldn’t need taxpayer dollars, and the Fed buying bonds is not a valid remedy to an economic emergency. It is business as usual for the extraction scam.
 
Dumping taxpayer money into the market does not pay the bills. It doesn’t help the real economy. It simply makes more money for those with enough money to invest. They might buy some high priced corporate products or a few luxury items, but that’s not going to save the economy.
 
The ongoing economic emergency, caused by state governments shutting down businesses, due to the coronavirus, is remedied only by providing money directly to the economy where people work.
 
The stimulus money is necessary for workers because most live paycheck to paycheck. They will spend the money paying bills, investors won’t. So why spend the lions-share of stimulus money buying overpriced market junk?
 
The policy assumes luxury items are more important than paying bills, which shows you the policy benefits those that write it, not the people who need it.
 
The balance sheet describes the ability of the Fed to commit an officially sanctioned accounting fraud. They have to put the bad debt from their false profits into a fake column on their ledger sheet to reconcile our increasing inequality, with taxpayer bailouts.
 
The balance sheet is a bottomless pit of fraudulent profits from other people’s money. It’s like saying I’m going to take your money but as you earn more the amount I took from you will be a smaller percentage of what you have, when you do finally earn it. So it all works out.
 
Oh, and by the way, I will need more before the percentage of what I took from you will be any less, so you can just owe me the difference on that. You can pay me the balance after you earn it.
 
That’s cool, right?
 
Without the black hole of taxpayer guaranteed off-the-books debt made possible by the balance sheet of the fed, there would be no billionaires. Society would be forced into an economic rethink, which is long overdue. Someday society will conclude a public profit bank was the solution to our funding problems all along. The balance sheet was just a way to maximize the extraction of money from the public.
 
The balance sheet enables massive inequality. Alternatively it could end poverty, but it doesn’t. Our government prefers the “trickle-down” approach to economic growth, which creates more inequality.
 
Poverty is an intentional policy that could be changed.
 
Increasing inequality by Fed policy not only makes most people more poor through inflation, it also makes some people very rich, who have too much “influence” over our government.
 
Private interests control public policy because of inequality.
 
As the inequality increases the middle class disappears along with the ability for a credible democracy. The necessary democratic reforms are self evident. We need to restore the balance in our economy to even have a democracy.
 
This is how we do the trickle down;
 
Ya see, I borrow money from your future for myself to spend now, and while I spend it you will get some of it too, by working for me. And when you work long enough the economy will grow and then you can pay me back for the money I borrowed from you last time. See how that works?
 
That’s cool, right?
 
We need democratic reforms to reduce inequality, but inequality is a major obstacle towards democratic reforms. There’s a problem.
 
So I spent some time reading about the emergency lending facilities of the fed and the need for commercial paper, and the CPFF, etc. It all left me with a bad case of confirmation bias. What a scam. The policy serves inequality.
 
The government taxes the public to profit shareholders.
 
Instead of taxing dividends properly, we borrow and spend which has compounded the inequality for decades. The result is market profits must now be guaranteed by the taxpayer to keep investors borrowing more money to invest in the scam.
 
The public has been squeezed like the proverbial turnip, so now the Fed needs to print money for further investor prosperity. The gold standard was originated, in part, to prevent this behavior and the economic instability that is sure to follow.
 
Counterfeiting corrupts the entire economy. The extraction scam is a shell game of fraudulent profits. Unlimited money is now available enabled by the Fed’s “balance sheet”. The Fed loans out unappropriated tax dollars for private profit, guaranteed by the taxpayers. How is that legal?
 
The Fed published a video to explain how it works:

 
Their video rationalizing the taxpayers buying bad debt for investor confidence is a perfect example of Academentia. It’s a self-validating word salad of nonsensical justification. We all just naturally assume this is our only choice because it is explained so professionally, regardless of what was being said.
 
Investors are reluctant to buy stocks, they say, because they might decrease in value. So the taxpayer will now “backstop” investor losses with borrowed money, if necessary, to insure investor confidence.
 
You have got to be kidding me.
 
Because investors depend on the continued dividends they got over the last four decades, from this scam, we will now insure their investments like we insure jobs and provide a kind of “unemployment insurance” for working capital. If the markets fail to deliver enough profits to the investors, don’t worry, the taxpayers will cover it.
 
Here’s a quote from Investopedia;
 
“Unlike any other business enterprise, the Fed can expand its balance sheet by printing as many dollar bills as it wants. It’s like creating winds merely by waving your hands.”
 
It’s no wonder with such god-like powers to create money from thin air their community is saturated with billionaires. Nation-states are subservient to their money now, which is the real representation the public seeks, not politicians. Politicians are forced into an economic obedience with the scammers, instead of serving the public.
 
Private money must be removed from our political system to prevent undue influence and corruption.
 
We now have a global community that can control governments by supplying them with, or depriving them of, the money they need to conduct adequate commerce.

 

Those who have preached decentralization have created a global system of centralized power based on non-collateralized debt, which is counterfeiting money. That is the system that must be reversed in order to achieve a democracy and prevent the national demise.
 
Money currently serves as a hierarchy of political authority. How do you compete politically against an adversary with unlimited money?
 
Money should be recognized as representation, because it is, and we should apportion congressional delegations accordingly, based on the populations income, which is more relevant than where they live.
 
Tax-bracket apportionment or something similar appears to be the only political reform significant enough to remedy our current social and political dysfunction. 
 
If we fail to reform our economic system, we are all just specs of dust beneath the fingernails of the gods who create money from thin air.
 
That is not a democracy.
 
I included the video clip with Bannon to show the balance sheet has been about the same since the last financial extraction. It doesn’t get paid back. The balance sheet merely serves as a buffer for the extraction scam, to add more leverage and hedge when overextending the bad debt piled on to the full faith and credit of the uninvested taxpayers. That gives investors confidence the scam still works so they will continue to pump their ‘winnings’ back into the global Ponzi scheme.

Spy Web

I had mentioned the need for a citizen’s network in the ‘remote voting’ post. This post shows how the government provides their spies with something similar.
 
Facebook for spies, with functionality like google, youtube, and twitter, is what the government should be providing to all citizens as a public utility.
 
I’m not going to take the time to impugn the spies today, but I will point out that their historical failures are self evident and their continued purpose is highly dubious at best.
 
On the other hand, citizens have a constitutionally guaranteed right to an adequate voting system. Spies do not.
 
The government does not fear the cost of the system, they fear the result of the system. That’s why it’s resisted, for the public.
 
When an organization like a political party controls the government, that’s not a democracy. That’s an organization that controls the government.
 
A democracy creates an organization that becomes the government. That’s different than an organization that competes for control of the government.
 
Political parties are private organizations that compete for control of the government. That is not compatible with constitutional intent. That is not a democracy.
 
The political parties are inherently divisive. They also create divisive policies, like providing spies with a fancy digital interface to spy on the public while depriving the public of a credible democratic process.
 
The spies congregate on their secret “spy web” and coordinate campaigns to manipulate public opinion.
 
Counters are twisted and bots and shills skew the numbers to make it look like the minority opinion is the majority, when it’s not.
 
Don’t you agree?
 
Whoever is against voting, raise your hand.
 
The president, it’s reported, is about to sign an executive order in an attempt to make social media companies liable for the content of their users. He says they have a monopoly. Others say they fact-checked one of his lies and called him out on it. So now it’s payback time. Both comments are obviously true.
 
The president is lying and the big tech companies are monopolies. It’s all true. Trump is always ready to insult a limb of the corrupt system to play pretend hero for the public. The president is attacking big tech to distract from their allegiance to the scam. They need each other. They are each other. There’s nothing benevolent happening here, so let’s move along, away from their narrative and back to mine.
 
It’s an absurd tightrope of self-serving deception the establishment must walk in order to deprive the public of a social media utility. As if the mere mention of the word capitalism justifies their decision.
 
Investing, speculating, and extracting, it is our economic philosophy, they dont say, while mailing you a ballot.
 
The government must now print money because its revenues have been wiped out, in large part, due to the digital revolution and the social media monopolies, who pay their taxes to shareholders instead of the public.
 
The result is what is happening now. The government is broke and your allegiance is to the money that’s invested in a government sanctioned global tax extraction scam. Your retirement depends on the perpetuation of that scam, regardless of what flag you fly.
 
Giant global social media monopolies will be ‘forced’ to “fact check” free speech because the government refuses to provide a citizen’s network to the public that is honest and verifiable. The result will be conflict and confusion because our system is based on competition. If it was based on cooperation and credibility we would already have a citizens network.
 

The idea of putting your personal electronic history on a private platform instead of a taxpayer funded citizens network is ridiculous. That’s what we have now and it’s a problem, in so many ways.

The solution to the social media problem is not censorship or to limit free speech. The solution is to provide an official government forum for debate and consensus where the truth becomes self evident and dissent is noted and accessible to anybody and everybody who wants to search the database. A citizens netwok would provide to ourselves and our posterity a permanent record of our progress as a people and a country, as citizens, not subscribers. We are citizens, not subscribers.

We deserve a citizen interface.

Printing Money

The most important takeaway from this piece, Printing Money, and the last piece, Illiquid Assets, is that they demonstrate the language being used to describe what is being done is an obfuscation.

Alternative words are used to confuse people from what’s actually happening. A good example is calling bad debt an illiquid asset, or saying stimulus, instead of taxpayer money. It’s lizard language.
 
Human Language;
“We need taxpayer money to buy our bad debt”.
 
Lizard Language;
“We need stimulus to unfreeze our illiquid assets”.
 
See how that works? It’s no big deal in lizard language. Sure, take some stimulus. Why not? You just need a little oil to grease up your assets.
 
But in human language you would say no way. The taxpayers are not going to buy your bad debt. That’s a perfect example of moral hazard being normalized. You need to fix your business model.
 
Notice the first thing the lizard says, (no offense, Henry) is that the Fed has to take extraordinary action to protect the economy. As if counterfeiting• is our heroic saviour, and only hope. Wrong!
 
The lizard was asked to explain simply, “Why are the markets going up on such bad economic news?” But he obfuscated, as lizards do, and was corrected with the term, “printing money”.
 
The lizard then praises the decision as the only choice. Professionally paid corporate lizards never mention the public interest choice. I’ll do that right here: Tax Billionaires!
 
The choice is to either print the money or tax massive profits properly. I say tax big money big time. It would be about time. It’s long overdue.
 
The Lizard says, “Another benefit of the Fed buying corporate junk bonds is that it gives investors confidence the market will rebound.”
 
Really? Ya think? Their previously profitable investments, now gone bad, get bailed out so investors can be confident enough to keep reinvesting in them until they go bad again and need another bailout, which is inevitable because that’s how it works.
 
This is the tax extraction scam that keeps the public broke. The business model is a political choice that needs to be corrected. It must be corrected, by law, to remedy the national demise.
 
A representative government would regulate its entire financial industry for economic balance, ethical compliance, and the common good.
 
Market gains are supposed to be based on economic growth. They are not supposed to be determined by people’s need for them. That’s not a market at all. That’s a scam.
 
The lizard goes on to say “Markets could be wrong”.
 
As if we can’t be sure how much money it will take to stabilize investor confidence in ‘The Market’. Is this stimulus for the current scam or the last scam? We don’t know! We might need to dump endless amounts of stimulus into the markets to keep investors confident, that their money will continue to be prosperous for them, in the tax extraction scam.
 
The markets are themselves now a business model nearly independent of economic performance. They are selling the dream of getting rich by investing in taxpayer bailouts. And it’s working.
 
Private investors profit from public debt. They don’t suffer from inflation because of their own economic growth. Investors are insulated from inflation and public debt. The uninvested taxpayer is not.
 
Inflation and public debt increase inequality.
 
The lizard correctly admits people won’t have enough money to support themselves, or the economy, without assistance. He assumes printing money is our best defense, which sanctions the entire extraction scam. So he’s not only wrong, the lizard is lying. He knows better.
 
The inflation problem is not that there’s too much money chasing too few goods, as the lizard said, ironically contradicting his own previous comment that people won’t have enough money. The problem is that those making the money aren’t chasing the goods. They are investing it back into the scam for more profits. That’s the problem.
 
The money is extracted from the economy and deposited into the scam, whose profits are then reinvested into the scam for more profits, instead of being spent into the economy, on people.
 
The reason the Fed has to perpetually print emergency money is because the government condones market profiteering retroactively insured by the taxpayers.
 
The public doesn’t have any money, only credit, because of the scam. That’s why investors prefer printing money. They don’t want to tax themselves and their ill-gotten gains. Gains they got from the scam.
 
• Note: The use of the word counterfeit is intentionally inflammatory, yet arguably accurate.

 

 

Illiquid Assets

LizardCorp 06 IlliquidAssets

“Our Illiquid Assets are freezing credit,” they say. “Nobody can get a loan, money just won’t move. We need more stimulus!”

When the corporate lizards say they have illiquid assets, that are freezing credit, what they really mean is they spent the money on themselves and it’s game over unless the public buys their debt with taxpayer money. They call that free money, “stimulus”.
 
They made a fortune “investing” but will lose it unless the public buys their “bad assets”. That’s how it works, by failing. It works for the investors but it fails for the taxpayers, every bailout.
 
The bad assets come in both illiquid and junk, but in the end it’s all the same. It’s a taxpayer extraction scam legislated as legal.
 
The taxpayer retroactively pays for the overcompensated corporate establishment lifestyle. The “system” then declares itself a success while it continues to fail in a “cycle” of over-leveraged credit and politically approved bailouts.
 
The corporate lizards say some funny things. Illiquid Asset is my personal favorite. The language describes an asset nobody wants.
 
The lizards call it an asset because it sounds like a better deal than a tax extraction scam, but it’s not. It’s the same thing.
 
Illiquid Assets are the byproduct of the extraction scam. The taxpayers are buying corporate lizard prosperity, called illiquid assets, or some similar linguistical derivitave intended to obfuscate the truth from the taxpaying public about what it is that they are actually buying.
 
IlliquidAssets3

Remote Voting

It’s not often the speaker comments on the future of democracy and technology. It’s a topic that rarely gets discussed.

Nancy knows there’s nothing in the constitution that prohibits remote voting. If there was she would have cited that, rather than her concerns about proxy voting.
 
You don’t need a committee to study the constitution to know remote voting is the future of democracy for the congress and the public.
 
Depriving the public of the technology to vote adequately is more likely to be unconstitutional than remote voting is. If the constitution was interpreted correctly Nancy would have to rewrite the house rules for compliance.
 
Where in the constitution does it allow for political parties?
 
If the public had a reasonable consensus system that worked as well as online banking, for instance, that would be a good start. There would be no voting lines and no horserace reporting.
 
Imagine if all the candidates had a constantly updated vote tally. The candidate with the most supporters on election day wins. Simple.
 
There is a lot of different ways to customize and simplify our voting experience. But we don’t.
 
“We haven’t got to it yet”, Nancy says as her webcam ironically malfunctions for a low quality moment.
 
An adequate electoral system that is accessible and verifiable, locally and nationally, could be achieved in short order. It’s possible. That’s what the public deserves. That’s what the government should prioritize.
 
The irony continues with Nancy mocking Zoom as a Chinese firm, even though Zoom is headquartered in San Diego. As if the United States can’t build our own communication system. We can’t trust China to provide our equipment so what are we supposed to do? She’s all out of ideas.
 
“This isn’t as easy as you might think” She says.
 
Wrong. It would be simple. It would be a citizenship network where everything is democratic and verifiable with no anonymous activity of any kind. The servers would be locally operated in each district to filter and tax commercial access to the community and validate poll results.
 
The citizens network would be able to facilitate voting but could also dispense funds in case of an emergency, like if we had a mass layoff due to a pandemic. The network could provide whatever functionality the public needs and can afford. And last I heard, money was no object.
 
And then Nancy asks, a little sarcastically, why the republicans would not want to fight waste, fraud, and abuse. It’s a rhetorical question that ignores the truth and deprives us of the answer, yet we all know what the answer is. It’s the money. What she calls waste they call profit.
 
“If it looks political to insist upon the truth, so be it.” – Nancy Pelosi