It’s been 58 years, today, since our president was gunned down in Dallas, Texas. If you don’t know the truth about why that happened then you have no context to properly understand what’s happening now in regards to the unravelling of our democracy.
That’s why it’s so ironic to see the misguided patriots supporting the anti-democratic movements. They’ve got it backwards. And the liberals, sworn to protect and defend our democracy, can’t fail the public fast enough, for personal gain. They will remain optimistic as they surrender our government to the globalized corporate monster. If you don’t see the self-serving sabotage by now you are either corrupt or confused.
The forum is open for counterpoint.
I work way too hard to be able to counterpoint the corporate narrative as often as I’d like. Funny how the system works that way. The left doesn’t have a voice because they don’t have time. It’s another example of the fraudulent nature of our democracy. Time allowing I will do a deeper dive on it all but for now, it’s the anniversary of the JFK assassination so I’m compelled to an official observance of my own.
It’s absolutely astounding to me, to see the Biden policy failures. I expected that most of his legislation would fail but not everything else. The president goes to the climate summit and pledges to do the right thing and then rolls over for the oil companies, who will spill and kill in the gulf and further pollute the ozone. It’s bizarro. He warns about dangers to our democracy yet supports the filibuster that betrays majority rule. He’s selling weapons to those killing children and he’s still putting kids in cages, they say, just like his predecessor. But now they get half a million each, supposedly, because we violated their rights, as democrats. That’s sounds like a scam to me, hidden in a lie. Seems they’d be lining up to be locked up for that kind of money. But who knows what to believe? They’re probably writing checks to ghosts, or something like that.
This is a post truth society now, full of illogical motives and contradictory conventional wisdoms. It’s hard to believe the dumbness that prevails. Being educated about our own horrifying history is now demonized as being woke, by those who supposedly predict the coming of the great awakening, which will save their righteous denials from the truth.
The truth. Not their truth.
The corporate narrative is unbelievable on both sides of the hyper-partisan divide. The government is divided and can’t define the truth. Trust in government is low and for good reason, which puts information distribution into the hands of contradictory motives. By conventional political wisdom, there’s a left side and a right side. You can choose one or the other but both sides are usually wrong on the things that matter most, which proves them united in their quest, which is primarily private profit. Which causes a lot of problems for a lot of people.
I would contend our current political situation is the direct result of our president being assassinated back then, followed by the dereliction of justice. The cover-up continues to this day. The lack of justice then has grown into the lack of justice now. The continuity of the establishment since the assassination of JFK is self-evident. What is normal today could have been prevented if the conspiracy was prosecuted properly by our government, back then. They could have prevented back then, the corruption we have now.
From Nixon to Trump, the establishment agenda has been clear and consistent. And even now, under a Biden admin, they control the government for economic extraction. They profit from the infinite leverage derived by betraying the full faith and credit of taxpayers. The democrats are in league with the same plan or they would do the right thing. They would fix the problem, which is themselves. They are an inadequate opposition, philosophically, to the authoritarian threat we face, despite being demonized as being radically that.
What’s wrong is that Biden thinks being more like a republican is the right thing to do. That’s backwards. It’s like trying to fix election fraud with voter suppression. It is totally illogical and inexcusable yet normal and acceptable nowadays. It is an intentional surrendor pretending to be an opposition strategy.
The republicans have moved to looney tune town. They are salivating like a cartoon wolf, waiting to return as unmasked authoritarians with license for maximum extraction. That leaves the democrats as the only sane party left for the establishment to support. So now the sane republicans can be democrats and those getting scammed are left without much representation at all, unless you include the optimistic but failing cheerleaders, being demonized for advocating welfare bandaids.
They love the free money. Everybody loves the free money. From left to right, nobody in the government will question the extraction scam as being abnormal or unethical or in need of correction. The emergency powers to create money as necessary is cool, by you, they say. That’s how it’s done. Here, have some money. The idea sells itself.
Aggressive counterfeiting causes inflation. The news pundits all ignore the money printing and blame inflation on anything but the scam.
The alternative that is never considered by our government, to reduce the inflation, would be to tax massive profits properly and pay down debt. But no, they’ll continue to tax the unborn because they don’t want to tax themselves, or you. It’s not that you, or they, need more money, it’s just that they need to protect and defend the scam, so investors get more money, from now on.
The disposable income from decades of corruption flows into crypto investments for laundering and comes out clean, as capital gains, for corporate lizards. The king lizard reigns supreme. He controls the fake money machine that makes it all possible. Joe Biden bowed to the king today, apparently, keeping him on to manage the never-ending financial crisis with his emergency powers. Despite our recent economic instability from his inflationary policies, the lizard king was chosen by the president because he relies on the continued stability of our economy.
It’s a kind of a bizarro-world here, where people just lie and that’s okay, to rationalize their logic, even if it’s untrue. It’s normal now. Maybe it’s always been this way. I don’t know, probably. But saying things like “I want economic stability” as prices are shooting up faster than crypto-coins, because of your nominee, is just lunacy. The president’s comment is an admission that inflation is the intention. It’s steady as she goes, for the institutionalized economic extraction scam.
I just have to throw-in here also, that Biden said that he had to pull out of Afghanistan now, quickly, or face more conflict with the Taliban during the fighting season. The commander of the largest military in the world is not going to dictate to the Taliban the terms, any terms, all terms. Especially the terms of departure. Who’s in charge here?
It reminds me of when I read the news that American warships turned tail because of the hooligans on the docks in Haiti. So the coup against Aristide would stand. Just another footnote of intentional failure.
I’ll get back to JFK asap. I saw on the news today Qanon was in Dallas holding up signs. It happens every year but now it’s a Q-thing, they say, so it’s big news. It’s another reason to remind you that a bunch of crazy people believe outrageous conspiracy theories.
Don’t be crazy, says the crazy man.
I will say some of my best friends are Qanon supporters. I’ve known them for decades and they never once expressed any interest in the JFK assassination or conspiracies of any kind. None of them did and they still don’t now. They have always saluted the status quo in allegiance to the system despite the contradictions of logic inherent in the system. Which means that Q is a corporate conspiracy to demonize conspiracy, comercially, by associating professionally paid crazy people with conspiracy “theories”.
Q is the corporate demonization of conspiracy. There’s no link between Q and any concern for the truth, wether it be JFK, democracy, or Trump. Or even the constitution for that matter. The only thing worse than misinterpreting the constitution is to go out and defend your misinterpretations with guns. Read it again. You are misinterpreting the intention of the constitution.
Rittenhouse, the kid who killed the protestors last summer, walked yesterday. He walked citing self-defense, despite being a minor with an assault weapon looking for a problem to solve. This is the normalization of violence against protestors. And it’s a perfect example of the corrupting influence of money in our justice system.
Make no mistake, the billionaires are on the offense against democracy. Supporting violence with money is a guarantee we’ll see more violence. Legal fees should be divided equally between the prosecution and defense, before trial, regardless of where it comes from, but that’s a topic for another time.
I’ll get back to all this, time allowing, for more editing. For now I’ll post an unedited rant I’ve been writing about inflation, voting, and the political spectrum, and of course, the filibuster. Proceed at your own risk. There’s redundancy warnings ahead.
——
Deconstructing conventional wisdom
The dems passed their build back better bill but it will be irrelevant unless the senate passes it as well. If Biden’s BBB social infrastructure bill passes the senate it will include more establishment welfare than it will include care for the taxpaying public.
The markets are at all time highs and investors are drowning in scammed profits. Printing money and excessive profit-taking from speculation are primary causes of inflation.
Without the taxpayer injections into the lizard economy, and cost of living increases, the corporate monopolies could not raise their prices.
The inflation scam would end.
When the lizard elite trickle that much funny money down to the masses, like they’ve been doing for years, prices are going to go up. It’s that simple. But, nobody seems to see it that way, because anybody who looks is likely profiting from the scam.
That’s how the “system” “works”.
The “Growth” of Wall Street dollars is made possible by devaluing Main Street dollars. That is inflation by design. That’s why prices are increasing. It’s intentional. Inflation would be corrected with taxes if the government was representative, but it’s not.
The government favors investors and rewards them unfairly, compared to those that work for money.
To increase inequality by design, Investors are given excessive and disposable income, using taxpayer money. “New” money increases wealth for corporations and investors, by devaluing everybody else’s money. Yet everybody is blaming the rapidly rising prices on our dysfunctional supply chains.
Which is absurd.
When the working poor get more money, they pay down their debts. That doesn’t cause inflation. When the lizard elite hoard money offshore, that doesn’t cause inflation, because it’s not really in the economy used by the public. But when corporate lizards are flooded with unethical and unearned Wall Street dollars, as has been happening now for decades, that causes inflation.
They just can’t seem to connect their over-leveraged corporate profit dots, apparently. Nobody seems to notice the practice of extraction through inflation is an intentional scam by policy design. The scam increases inequality instead of reducing it, that alone should be enough to understand it’s a scam.
Inflation is a scam.
Our dysfunctional supply chains are a convenient scapegoat for the scam. The supply sabotage is a diversion strategy, by those that profit from the scam.
To claim our supply chains are failing is also an admission that the global economy is also a scam, by design. We couldn’t have foreseen the pandemic, they say, even though they must know by now it’s never going away.
They will not abandon the scam.
The economic solution is domestic production. It’s a simple, even default, idea that you would have to be a scammer to deviate from it. Yet that’s what they did. The global scam is an economy designed by scammers.
Inflation is an extraction scam. It’s not because money is borrowed at low interest or because global corporations have monopolies that create too much profit. It’s because the system steals money from the future and launders it through the markets to reward investors today.
Investors monopolize economic growth.
Prices and “wealth” rise in tandem. The uninvested people are deprived of economic growth. If they don’t get a cost of living increase they become more poor comparatively, to the invested. That’s inflation.
Main Street dollars are devalued by saturating the economy with Wall Street dollars. That makes the money from working worth less, because investors now have so much more of those dollars, borrowed from the future, by policy.
Giant monopolies can conspire to raise prices and get away with it, because enough consumers have more money. The establishment is compensated for the increased cost of living while Main Street gets the squeeze. That’s the scam.
Inflation is a tactic of economic warfare by the establishment, against the public.
The “system” increases inequality with public policy. That is the opposite result and intention of an honest democracy, which proves the system is “rigged” to benefit some at the expense of others. Which is exactly backwards of the way it is being reported.
There’s clearly a lot of confusion in the media-sphere and beyond when it comes to understanding what is really going on in our country. Despite the corporate fog of contradictory opinion at least one thing is becoming more clear to me.
Everybody is either corrupt or confused, or both.
Our post-truth paradigm requires partisan conflict. Each side can blame the other now, for how things are, and accuse each other of lying and trying to hide their bad intentions from the public. Their partisan divisions make political solutions impossible.
Party politics prevent political solutions.
The official narrative itself, as hosted by the corporate media, is a distraction from political solutions. Allow me to correct some of the nonsensical contradictions that are embedded into their story. It is a narrative most people supposedly accept, as presented by the corporate news, as seen between their commercials.
Corporate conventional wisdom is a fraud. The professional “left” rolls over for the right, consistently. Wether it’s those we elect or those who are paid to report what they do. The collusion against the political left by the professional left, for money, is undeniable.
Independent News
Time allowing I will put some youtube independent news pundits in my forum. There’s an industry of independent opinions finding market share as the faith in our mainstream truth slowly dies.
Independent news channels are now challenging the establishment news. There’s a diverse blend of pundits on the internet arguing about what is true and why it matters.
I will post some favorites soon and opine.
Professionals constrain our political spectrum. They have effectively abandoned the public majority. The professional constraint is a deceptive and exclusionary tactic that rejects democratic reforms, and rejects their mandated mission to promote the general welfare.
Who are all these people electing anti-democratic authoritarians? I suspect it’s election fraud because it’s the only thing that makes any sense. When so many people vote against their own well-being for so long the problem must be propaganda, or election fraud. What else could it be?
Left versus Right
Let’s breakdown the reality of the political spectrum. The right is always in power. The left is a reaction to the injustice of the right. The left has never led anything except protests against the right.
The left is a protest vote to the way things are. The way things are is always controlled by the “right’. If somehow “the left” was able to control and enforce the law, they would no longer be the left. They would become the right. The “right” is the status-quo.
Joe Biden is the status quo. He is the “right,” wether he likes it or not and despite what you might think. Your position on the spectrum is a mathematical fact based on your wealth. To argue Biden is a leftist is a propaganda tactic by the establishment to prevent the “left” from achieving more representation. The “left” threatens the economic supremacy and social privileges of the “right”, and their left-wing advocates, so the debate, like the spectrum, is constrained to exclude the “left”.
There is no “left” in the establishment. There might be left-wing advocates and sympathizers, but economically they are not the “left”. They help negotiate acceptable expectations of the “left” and enjoy the privileges of the “right”. They sympathize for the lack of representation the establishment provides the left but are unable to create a coalition to help them, apparently.
The political spectrum needs to be recognized as an economic spectrum. The poorest are on the left and the richest are on the right. Your wealth defines your position on the spectrum for you, despite what you might think, say, or even do.
Representatives should be apportioned accordingly.
It’s easy to advocate for the left while enjoying the economic privileges of the “right”. Despite your partisan affiliations your money defines your position on the spectrum.
It’s very difficult to criticize the left from further left because the establishment has defined those opinions and expectations as being extremely radical, when they’re not.
Left wing expectations are a reaction to right wing injustice.
Top of the list of left-wing remedy would be called the great correction, where the grand scam is retired and our economy becomes legitimized for the future, with ethical balance.
The amount of our public debt justifies the expectations of the “left” yet they remain forsaken. The establishment constrains the political spectrum to prevent any discussion that could educate the public as to the potential of their political fulfillment.
Even now you can’t imagine it.
It’s all backwards.
Despite Biden actually being on the political “right” he is characterized on the news as leading the “left”. The lizard lemmings parrot that lie as a political strategy and eventually the erroneous analysis becomes conventional wisdom. If you repeat the lie enough, despite its implausibility, it eventually is accepted as true, they say, when it’s not. They can only say that because nobody can do anything about it anyway. So that’s a lie.
If President Joe is the “left-wing” socialist that the right-wing claim him to be, logic would dictate that those who are further to the “left” of him, are radically extreme leftists. Which is the same lie compounded to cartoonish absurdity. Aside from constraining the spectrum, the tactic is an attempt to validate an ideology of meritocracy that allows the right to rationalize their supremacy.
It seems to be working.
Of course we can afford to build bridges, and subsidize seniors who need dental care and glasses. As if that’s a radical idea. The “right” are awash in false profits and together with the democrats they deprive “the left” of their representation.
That’s not a democracy. That’s a betrayal. The democrats are not the left and the republicans are not the right. That logic is a distraction from political solutions and democratic reforms.
The so-called “right” represent the way things are, they are the status quo, regardless of what “party” has a majority. The “right” are always in control of public policy. The “left” becomes the “right” when they control public policy. So, the right is always in control of public policy and the left never is.
The government is the “right”.
The “right” knows they need to build bridges and fix roads. Investors will profit from the growth. The right will ignore subsidizing public health, advocated by the left. But the right will profit from “stimulus extraction”, so the bill passed. They want the public’s money and they will get it. They always do.
The left versus the right is a money fight.
The political spectrum is defined by wealth, not belief. Your ideology is irrelevant to your representation. Those on the right are protesting against equality. The right are afraid that “the left” will become comparatively more equal, economically, diminishing their privileges and threatening their supremacy. The democrats pay lip service to the left, while serving themselves, and the right.
The reason for democracy is to prevent violence between the left and the right by negotiating economic compromises into law, and enforcing them for ethical balance and the common good.
Voting Rights
Our dilapidated democracy is under attack like never before. Any hope for an honest democracy will be gone without an updated electoral system, which ain’t happening.
Increasing inequality and conflict is intentional.
The “right” will no longer need to negotiate with the left because they won’t have to. The right will dominate the left forevermore. The “right” will never lose because they prosper from the conflict.
To best understand the scam plaguing our society, first consider that our “rulers”, abandoned conventional savings accounts long ago. Interest rates for saving money are lower than inflation rates, so you will lose money saving it in a bank. The smart money must invest in the scam. And we like our money smart, so it goes to the scammers.
Market profiteering from public debt.
The result is your savings became their profits. Same with your investments now. The government is forced to reimburse the scam with public debt. And you proclaim that they are socialist because your lizard overlords do, despite all of you being the beneficiaries of the extraction scam, while calling the down-trodden, communists.
The lizards have burdened the public with debt and now demonize them as a socialist threat.
Democracy manages the distribution of wealth.
It’s good to see the struggle for our democracy is being reported a bit more seriously now. It’s a nonstop top-story on all of our favorite corporate news channels. The bad news is that it deserves to be. It needed to be top story decades ago, but wasn’t. Our democracy has always been in trouble and by now, the resistance efforts are too little too late, if not outright insincere.
The monster unmasks slowly, ever so slowly, to not cause a fuss. But the fuss is coming. The resistance pundits mostly agree and do their best to shame the opposition, which are those who are killing our democratic potential and preventing a peaceful succession to a more representative government.
They are the monster. They are shameless. They oppose democracy. They must be stopped, by democracy.
The Big Lie
It is a mind bending spectacle of deception to watch the news parade the liars from previous administrations out to testify about how bad the “Big Lie” is now, for democracy. It’s crazy because this is a continuation of what they themselves used to do. It’s an attempt to whitewash their own history and complicity in the big anti-democratic agenda that has grown now into an institutional monster, merely managed by a fresh litter of the lizard elite.
Old republicans pretend that the new republicans are becoming crazy puppets of authoritarian intent. They try to make you think that they weren’t that before, but they were. The truth is that is exactly what they have always been. The republicans are a coalition of corrupted liars and confused patriots. They have practiced supremacy disguised as an ideology for as long as I can remember.
Every republican administration has had their big lies, and to be fair, so have the democrats. Together, as the government, they have always lied to the public. The new big lie is the same as the old lie. It’s just becoming more institutionalized now because it is undeniable and it’s getting harder to hide it. They know they can’t continue to hide the truth, so they will normalize the lie.
The truth is they don’t like democracy.
The big lie is an attempt to disassociate the old liars from the new ones so they don’t look like an institution of liars, but that’s what they are. That’s what our government is.
Defending the conflict based economy with lies is a prosperous profession. Serving the public has been legislated to motivate corruption. So that’s what happens. With little exception public servants become corrupt by design and betray our democracy and the constitution for personal profit.
We can fix that.
When government servants pay fines for crimes without punishing the people responsible for those crimes, it is the government sanctioning that criminal activity, punishing the public for the crime, instead of the criminals. If the crime is paid for with public money, the government becomes the criminal.
When an institution pays for the crimes of its unpunished members it is the institution itself that becomes the criminal, indicted or not. In reality the criminals conspire with the government to punish institutions instead of themselves, allowing them to break the law without consequence by deflecting the punishment they deserve on to their institutions.
The Big Lie
The truth is the big lie is a continuation of all the old lies. The big lie is the same old and ongoing lie, which is that those who occupy the government support our democracy, when they don’t. That is the root lie on a big tree full of big lies.
The big lie is that the government supports democracy. It favors the establishment over the public and it always has. The truth is the big lie is a conspiracy to justify, against all logic, voter suppression tactics, to favor themselves, the “right”.
The corporate narrative is illogical at best. It’s an ongoing lie. The financial- supremacists have declared election fraud now and the only way to fix it, they say, is with voter suppression. Their motive is beyond implausible.
They are all lying.
The big lie is a bunch of scripted and contrived nonsense. Both sides can proclaim fraud against the other now and refuse to concede lost elections. Rather than fix the problem with a modern electoral system that works, as previously described, the government will use the big lie as an excuse to entrench themselves further into their own corruption.
Supposedly the majority of eligible voters in our democracy are for them, and voter suppression. Not likely.
Ya can’t trust um.
As their story goes now, Somehow, an executive cabinet member in the justice department can decide if congress has the authority to subpoena a witness and compel them to testify, or not? That’s ridiculous.
Let’s ask a cabinet member chosen by the president to decide the extent of congressional authority. You must be kidding me. I have to conclude you are all either corrupt or confused because that is blatantly unconstitutional.
It’s a bit like the senate hiring a parliamentarian to validate their illegal rules. It’s a violation of law on both counts, and by any honest interpretation of the law, would be corrected.
Those important legal misinterpretations are indications that the government has become a servant of the monster. They govern against the public interest and the common good, to profit investors.
The Justice Dept. is Political
“Congress may as well pack up and go home.” Adam Schiff
AG Garland heads the same organization that missed the January 6th attack. That was the premeditated attack against our democracy. Apparently the FBI was too busy auctioning off confiscated crypto and negotiating with the cyber-criminals to see it coming. I wouldn’t expect much cooperation from the justice department, nor should the insurrection commission.
No crimes here, move along people.
We’ll get back to the insurrection, but for now I’ll just mention we still have increasing divisions in our economy and our representation. The markets are at all time highs and the public is massively in debt,
The government has decided the public can’t afford to subsidize seniors. If you can’t afford dental insurance and eye-glasses that’s too bad. You must live with the resulting headaches because you lack representation.
At the same time the corrupt are all carving out their slush funds, which they will invest for unrealistic growth, ultimately paid for by the extraction scams waged against the non-invested working poor and those burdened with the ongoing headaches from poor vision and tooth decay.
Inflation
Inflation is extraction. Inflation allows the establishment to reconcile their excessive profits by devaluing the currency.
Imagine every dollar you spend, from now on, will have about a quarter of it stolen by a public policy that profits investors. Inflation takes money from those who work and transfers it to those who invest.
Investor profits cause inflation. That is the intentional result of the trickle down supply side scam. Profits are made and reconciled by devaluing everybody else’s money. The lizard elite trickle down ‘cost of living’ increases to the overcompensated corporate lemming class which makes them immune to the scam, while everybody else suffers the consequences of earning and spending devalued dollars in a rigged economy.
And then they raise the prices.
Inflation is out of control, as expected. Prices are sky-rocketing for the public and their dollar is losing buying power. The price fixing is forcing everybody to raise their prices which is causing markets to hit all time highs while the government tries to justify their frugal fraud that deprives the public of what they need.
What a scam. The prices are rising for the public who now must pay more, with their devalued dollars, for goods and services, to corporations that are subsidized by public policy. It’s a double whammy for the working poor by our corporate government
Supply Chains
We’ve got supply chain problems, they say, and inflation is increasing fast, which causes prices to go higher for your devalued dollar. Which hurts the working poor much more disproportionately compared to investors. The lizard elite who became rich because of global finance profit the most.
These shortages demonstrate how ridiculous our policies are. As if there’s a blockage at the ports and we can’t find truckers. This type of pathetic dysfunction should be seen as intentional. If it’s not intentional it is negligent mismanagement and the result is the same. It is totally intolerable governance and in need of immediate correction.
If the trucking companies and the ports paid people appropriately, and I suspect they do, there would be no shortage of workers. That’s why I have to conclude the supply shortages are intentional and partisan hackery by collusion and mismanagement.
My shop has been waiting for moulded wood for over a month. First time ever any inventory has been delayed. Apparently we don’t have wood in the United States. We have to wait for it to be unloaded at the port, I hear. Are you kidding me?
It’s a horrible system. Global trade is the problem. Investing in globalism is worse. Official supply chain policy is exactly backwards, as usual, for the public. The global investor scam maximizes profits for some by exploiting others. The practice should be ended wherever possible, asap.
The supply chain problem is a corporate conspiracy against Joe Biden and the pseudo-liberal democrats, to sabotage the economy, as a political strategy, seems to me, to make it look like the so-called “left” is helplessly incompetent.
I’d say they are failing intentionally.
The economy was manipulated that way against Jimmy Carter as well, in a similar fashion back in the seventies. The oil companies bought enough political influence here to reverse President Carter’s campaign against foreign oil, and the rest is history. So the political tactic is not without precedence.
Inflation and dysfunction are political weapons.
The national demise has begun. It is being accepted and normalized by design. The public abandonment is becoming undeniable. The social problems from our public policies are getting worse, with no corrections in sight.
President Biden took some questions at a town hall and answered honestly and sincerely. Unfortunately, if one can parse reason and logic, it’s clear he inadvertently exposed his illogical analysis to remedy our anti-democratic predicament, the predicament he so adequately describes.
The president explains our democracy is in danger by those who should pay their fair share, while at the same time refusing to condemn those in his own party who are obstructing corrective legislation and Joe’s campaign “beliefs”. It reeks of intentional failure.
The democrats must purge their party of opposition, imo. Unfortunately, that would probably include the president. The partisan division is way to polarized to pretend that inter-party dissension can be tolerated. Voting against the public is clearly corrupted behavior that defines the opposition party for what they are. They are the opposition.
The Filibuster
Anybody against majority vote must be purged from the Democratic Party. Period. The filibuster advocates must be completely purged from the party if the party cares about credibility at all, moving forward. I’m skeptical they do, but that can change with some persuading.
I don’t want to keep beating the filibuster horse but it’s just that important. It can’t be forgotten that the For the People voting rights bill died in the senate because the VP didn’t break the tie. The bill was defeated by a tie vote where the tie-breaking vote was an abstention. Apparently The VP thought her vote didn’t matter because a sixty vote threshold is now required to proceed to debate. Because the super-vote threshold is illegal, if VP had voted for the bill, the president could have signed it into law and the high court would have been forced to rule on the question of majority vote, or majority vote would now be the law of the land. None of that happened. Think about it.
The filibuster could have been ended.
Biden could have called the majority vote a victory for the voting rights bill, if the VP had voted. The vote count on cloture to proceed could have been used to claim that the legislation had passed, forcing the filibuster into the high court to overrule the president.
It’s reported there must be a rule change to fix the filibuster but there was no rule change to break it. So that’s a lie. It’s just a sixty vote threshold now, to kill legislation with majority support to protect incumbents and “investors”. The legality of the filibuster was established by “tradition”, like slavery was, for economic reasons.
The media remains negligent.
If they wanted to, the VP or the majority leader could fire the parliamentarian and hire someone to interpret the rules honestly. The filibuster would no longer require a supermajority to proceed because the senate rule that prevents majority vote is out of order and would be corrected with an honest ruling.
Corrupt or Confused
Abolish the filibuster and be done with it. Stop pretending that the republicans will take advantage of it when they become the majority, because they always do, despite you and your bipartisan dreams of cooperation.
The idea that republicans will become a majority again is the question to be considered. How much electoral fraud does it take for a poor state to reelect the same old fascist wannabes? With credibility? Probably a lot. A lot of fraud.
Our intentionally inadequate electoral infrastructure is the reason we have politicians hellbent on ending our democracy in the first place. At the same time the media is reporting that questioning our elections is pro Trump, so by default those who question our elections support Trump. Which is absurd. Those who believe Trump’s big lie don’t care about democracy and shouldn’t be used as justification to deny the necessary democratic upgrades we need to save our democracy from the corrupt.
Democracy and corruption are incompatible. Corruption is an irrefutable betrayal of the public trust. If the government is going to vote against voting rights then they are an adversary to democracy and an obstruction to representative government and therefore, for all intents and purposes they are collectively corrupt, and in violation of their legally mandated purpose of protecting constitutional intent.
The lines are clearly defined, to me, and both parties are against the public. As if we can’t afford anything but more corruption. Despite investors with record profits and stock markets at their all time highs, somehow we can’t come up with the money to pay for dental and vision care for seniors. At the same time we fund the culture of excessive corporate profits derived from the mismanagement of 130 trillion dollars of now unreconcilable public debt.
I’m guessing those who could, stole the public’s money with corrupt extraction scams and is laundering it now through crypto market Ponzi schemes. Some people are becoming filthy rich and at the same time hard working taxpayers can’t afford daycare so they can go to work. The purpose of government is to correct that kind of thing, but they don’t. The path to political solutions for the public has been corrupted by the government. Let’s fix it.
Political Solutions: Apportionment.
Imagine if congressional apportionment was determined by income tax brackets. Representatives would be elected from a federal tax-bracket to represent those in that tax bracket, instead of districts. If those elected from the lower incomes ran for another term, as an incumbent, they would be running against the higher tax bracket because as reps, they make more money. The result would be that incumbency would be nearly impossible, because incumbents would all be in the same higher tax bracket, that is less populated, forcing incumbents to compete against each other for fewer available seats.
Tax bracket apportionment could motivate representatives to legislate a better economic balance for the public.
Representatives would be forced to run against each other because after being elected, they’re now all in the same tax bracket. They would run against each other which would make way for the new reps from the lower tax brackets, which would be more populated and therefore apportioned a greater percentage of available seats. Then just add enough reps as allowed in the constitution and declare them non-partisan and required to serve electronically from their home states.
Done, the rest will follow.
Tax bracket apportionment would revolutionize the house of representatives. So could so-called block-chain technology. All government deliberations should be permanently documented and searchable, for the record. We need to invest in a citizen’s network for reasons which should be self-evident to any honest and ethical democracy advocate. The future is digital. Democracy must be digital, now.
Why are we not having congressional hearings on the filibuster?
This poorly defined senate procedure has been obstructing good public policy for decades. The public deserves an airing of what is actually happening here.
What’s happening is corporate policy is being passed by majority vote while public policy is defeated by minority vote. It’s an absolute outrage, because it’s clearly illegal yet accepted as normal procedure, even by our favorite liberal senator, Mr. Bernie Sanders.
This video of the senator, fielding a filibuster question, demonstrates the typical confusion people are having when trying to understand and describe the filibuster.
The question is, “can we reform the filibuster?” The answer is, “We don’t have the votes”.
The questioner assumes that extended speech and majority rule are somehow the same filibuster topic. That’s what everybody thinks, apparently, but it’s not true. Majority rule and the filibuster are linked only by deception and intentional misinterpretation. A rule change to require sixty votes to proceed should not be called a filibuster. That’s like calling running a red light, speeding. It’s not the same.
Both men agree they would get rid of it, without properly defining what “it” is. If it’s not defined exactly, it can’t be corrected. And that’s why we need congressional hearings on the filibuster.
Legislation is supposed to pass by majority vote. Any senate rule that violates that majority vote intention is unconstitutional.
A cloture vote to proceed is an oxymoron.
Listen to the senator closely. He says “We should get rid of the filibuster AND restore majority rule”. That’s because they’re two distinctly different topics. Extended speech does not prevent majority rule, requiring a supermajority to proceed, does. Everybody needs to understand that distinction if the public is to ever transcend this so-called sixty-vote threshold “filibuster” “rule”.
The senate filibuster is merely the word they are using to refer to the unwritten rule change that now requires sixty votes to proceed to a majority vote. They didn’t change any rules, they just interpret them differently now, for minority rule.
The minority can prevent majority rule. That’s not a democracy.
The “filibuster” is a violation by misinterpretation and the senator should be having hearings on it, to prove it. If the senate doesn’t correct the problem, the senator should take them to court.
So yes, Senator Sanders, you are very mistaken, as pontificated in the video. It’s not about getting senate votes, it’s about the senate breaking the law. The filibuster, which is actually a rule change, is a crime against the constitution and should be declared as such by everyone, including the high court, to help restore our democracy to majority rule.
So out of nowhere Texas passes an illegal law allegedly intended to prevent abortions. It’s another in a long line of intentional legal misinterpretations for private interests. Apparently the Texans have empowered the intrusive and intolerant rabble to hunt down the people in the abortion business, for litigation and vigilante profit.
If the state empowers the public to violate your civil rights, it’s okay, they say. It’s legal, is their logic. The state is not violating your constitutional rights, but you can violate the rights of somebody else now, for them, legally, and get a reward.
The Texas abortion ban effectively outlaws legally protected behavior. It’s an important marker in the timeline where the states begin to be more autonomous from federal oversight, ironically, while crafting legislation to violate the personal autonomy rights of the pregnant.
The Supreme Court remains mostly mute. So does congress. They were taken by surprise, supposedly, and will need time to deliberate any attempts at correcting this gross injustice. As if the Texas legislature didn’t seek pre-clearance with the court. This monolithic conspiracy is a system of relationships loyal to each other in disloyalty to the law.
Their commonality is self interest. Like a ball team with a common goal, everybody instinctively knows what to do.
That’s why it’s so inexcusable for TRMS to refer to the filibuster as a law, when it’s not. That’s an intentional fumble to confuse. Notice in the beginning of the video how she refers to the filibuster as a law instead of a senate rule. There is no way she is unaware of her “mistake”, meaning it wasn’t a mistake. It was an intentional mistake. She is spreading corporate propaganda to further confuse her audience, to protect and defend the filibuster against an honest analysis.
Alternatively, Lawrence O’Donnell is laying out some important historical facts. You’ll find his Bush-Trump Court segment in this video. It’s a brilliant piece where he presents some rare stats about the history of judicial apportionment, which demonstrates that traditions change, and we’re long overdue to change ours.
We have a constrained court with judges organized in service to themselves instead of an honest interpretation of the law. The court must be corrected to save our democracy. Nobody deserves the benefit of the doubt, especially not the court. It’s that important.
Without ethical justice ideology is irrelevant.
We need judicial reform to de-politicize our courts for credible legal interpretation. We will never achieve the necessary judicial reforms unless we first update our democracy. We can’t update our democracy without majority rule. So the minority rule by senate filibuster must be ended, first, in order to expand the court, by majority vote.
We should expand the court by adding 50 justices to it, for starters, to be comprised of the senior justices from the fifty states. An adequately staffed Supreme Court with honest constitutional interpretations would quickly overrule illegal state legislation, discouraging bad actors from attempting to legislate against the constitution in the first place.
This big government anti-abortion overreach is part of a pattern, or plot if you will, to deprive the public of an honest democracy. Controlling the law is a necessity for authoritarian rule. That’s why justice should be more democratized.
We should democratize the Justice Dept. The public should be choosing every executive cabinet member, unless otherwise mandated in the constitution, democratically by majority vote.
We need to change our anti-democratic traditions, especially the courts. The courts need to be expanded and more transparent and more accountable to a public consensus of credible interpretation. The congress should begin impeachments for judicial dereliction right away and start crafting legislation for credible court reforms.
The Texas abortion ban law is similar to the filibuster in that they are both illegal and remain in need of correction by the Supreme Court. The democrats will remain confused and divided, as usual, while the republicans continue to corrupt the economy in their favor.
The Texas abortion ban has to be noted as another whammy in a long line of successful body slams to the public interest, by a cabal of right-wing fanatics. They are authoritarians pretending to be conservatives to help disguise and validate their anti-American agenda.
Rulings like money is speech and corporations are people, expose the anti-democratic nature of the corporate court. Justice serves the money.
Legal Tyranny
If a state is allowed to pass a law that is illegal and the court refuses to step up and do their job, honorably, we have lost our legal system to the monster. We now have a murky corporate monster party made out of money, with a politically subservient judiciary ready to comply.
The non-action response from the federal bench is a green light to states to not only violate their citizens voting rights, but to also legislate themselves a generous portion of corruption. The central government will encourage that sort of behavior, from now on, it appears. Whether they know it or not.
Corruption is its own reward.
The republicans have been successful for decades with their anti-democratic agenda, while the democrats have consistently failed to stop them. They must be confused, or corrupt, is the only logical conclusion.
It’s almost as if they have all conspired for decades against codifying abortion rights for the public into law. Even if they didn’t conspire to fail, the result is the same. The government can now claim the legal precedent to slide the slippery-slope towards total control over your body, against your will.
My position on abortion is that the patient and the doctor should have the only say in the matter. If a father comes forward with standing then there might be an exception requiring a judge. Otherwise, forget about it.
If the right to life movement cared about life, they would care about people, not just the unborn. The pro-life agenda is a hypocritical contradiction that should not be trusted for a second. Even if the passionate pro-life motive seems altruistic it violates the sanctity of human autonomy, the root requirement for personal freedom.
Civility requires personal security for everybody.
The most important takeaway from this post is the filibuster, blocking popular legislation in the senate, should actually be called the sixty-vote threshold rule. Lawrence cites that reality in the video. He nails the root of the discussion but ignores the importance of the distinction.
The senate rule that killed the legislation to save our democracy has been misdefined to distract from the debate about the constitutional intention of majority rule, which would prove the “filibuster” is not only misdefined, it is illegal.
The tie-breaking authority in the constitution is a mandate to rule by majority vote. But now, incompatibly, the senate requires a supermajority just to proceed to the vote so it takes a sixty vote threshold to pass legislation. When the senate requires a supermajority to proceed to a majority vote, it’s no longer a majority vote. It’s minority rule.
Senate rule 8.1 obstructs majority rule so it is unconstitutional and it was just used to defeat voting rights.
Keep in mind, when trying to understand the corporate narrative explaining how we are all losing our democracy, that we never really had one in the first place. The constitutional theory of our republic has been violated from the beginning, by misinterpretation and corrupt intent.
Despite having the technology to enforce constitutional compliance now, we don’t and we won’t. Which exposes the non-representative nature of our government. Those who occupy it will continue to violate the constitution, as is the tradition, to increase their financial supremacy.
That’s not a democracy.
Our electoral systems are designed to prevent an honest democracy. Voters are confused by design. They attempt to navigate a political system based on belief, where truth is a choice. We vote for our beliefs to be true by electing liars. You’re right, they’ll say, when you’re not.
Economic Apportionment: Mathematics vs Belief
There are two primary sides competing for control of our government, the corrupt and the confused. The corrupt always win because they have corrupted the system to favor corruption. If you disagree you might be confused, or possibly corrupt. Of course there are exceptions to a degree, but for the most part, that’s the truth.
Good and evil are not defined by a map or a party of misguided beliefs. Behaviors are judged in universal truths that have been considered for centuries by the civilized and educated people of this planet and documented for future understanding and consensus. Good and bad behaviors are instinctively understood.
Doing the right thing is self-evident. The problem is doing the right thing is rarely on the ballot. Ironically, the people who get elected don’t often do the right thing, for the public.
The democrats have the majority in the senate now but yet they can’t even get a voting rights bill to the floor for debate, they say, which is preposterous. It’s an example of intentionally losing by misinterpreting the rules against yourself. Which is what democrats do, by and large.
Traitors and betrayal
It appears the opposition has either bribed, recruited, or somehow planted saboteurs on our side in the senate to sabotage the voting rights bill. They are blocking the democratic agenda by deploying shills to vote with the corrupt, against the public and our democracy.
Republicans with democratic name-tags will be deployed in whatever numbers are necessary to prevent democracy. The corrupt will vote against the public interest, as necessary, in service to private “special” interests. That’s what they do.
Some call them moderates.
The democrats always fail. Even when they win the public loses. For instance, the senators recently debated an infrastructure bill. After hearing that it’s time for corporations to pay their fair share, it’s becoming clear that whatever passes, if anything, will be paid for by borrowing more money from those who refuse to pay taxes.
Which is a typical fail.
There’s a phony theory going around about modern money mechanics, saying public debt doesn’t matter. It’s a theory being preached by the supposed progressives, yet ironically the practice enables massive inequality and allows tax immunity to billionaires. We borrow money instead of taxing it, to pay for public programs, which exposes the scam for what it is. It’s a tax extraction scam that rewards investors who profit from public debt.
Instead of taxing private “special” interest groups, the government borrows it and pays them “interest” with taxpayer money.
We need updated infrastructure but we also need a lot less public debt and fewer billionaires. We need an outright ban on billionaires, imo, by taxing them to balance our budget.
The appropriated stimulus money, if passed, will no doubt profit the undertaxed investor class the most. That’s why the republicans support the bill. They will make money by investing in those they hire. Those who actually do the work always make a lot less for their efforts.
Taxing inequality, reducing public debt, and providing an adequate democratic process for the public could all be part of this infrastructure bill, but that’s not going to happen. It would if we had a representative government, but we don’t. We need to fix that.
Solution: Electoral Infrastructure
Rather than modernizing our electoral network infrastructure for citizens to vote, our corporate controlled government is conspiring to suppress our voting rights even further. They intend to sustain control of our government and to protect and defend the extraction scam, legally, from now on. That’s their plan.
Voter suppression efforts like denying access to the ballot and gerrymandering are in vogue now, as I predicted way back. I wrote ten years ago, “quasi-legal tactics will be used as propaganda to convince you that the monolithic antidemocratic conspiracy wins elections legally, so it’s fair, you believe, which will distract you from the outright election fraud and other schemes likely being used, that are criminal, which is not fair.”
Political crimes.
Gerrymandering, like the filibuster, is designed to scam and confuse. They are professionally explained as if there’s no choice to them. There’s no alternatives to consider, they’ll say, to defend their scams.
Gerrymandering is in fact a form of legalized election fraud. It’s one antidemocratic strategy among many. It’s not going to overturn the results of a statewide election by itself though, unless the election is really close, because congressional districts are required to be divided into equal populations.
Keep in mind when you gerrymander a district, which should be outlawed, the neighboring districts minority gains votes and becomes more of a majority. So a guaranteed minority victory requires more than gerrymandering. You can expect all means of electoral fraud strategies to be used. They should all be identified and corrected by law.
When a small fraction of the population controls a large fraction of the nation’s wealth, elections shouldn’t even be close. They say the public is evenly divided. Maybe they are, maybe they’re not. Either way, nobody deserves the benefit of the doubt when it comes to election results.
If our electoral system can’t validate its results to the satisfaction of a well scrutinized inspection, we need a new system that can.
Election Fraud versus Voter Suppression
The absurdity of the big lie, alleging election fraud, being remedied by voter suppression tactics should be all the insight you need to understand the deceptive and antidemocratic intention of the opposition.
Preventing an honest democracy is what our government does. So to achieve representative government, we need a new apportionment act to revolutionize the way we vote.
This is the anniversary of the voting rights act.
56 years ago president Johnson was forced to pass voting rights laws because his world was about to explode in conflict and division. A violent revolution was becoming imaginable. Compromise was becoming the only logical option, for self-defense. So they passed a law that they knew was unconstitutional. That way it would appease the angry agents of change but they could still strike it down in the court, if necessary, someday in the future.
Well, someday has finally come and the establishment has decided it’s time to undue what Johnson did way back then and gut the voting rights laws.
Those who control the government no longer need to compromise with the angry masses, like they did in the sixties. Now the establishment has the technological arsenal and the militarized police forces to control any situation. They can suppress any amount of domestic opposition and that’s exactly what they plan to do, for a living. It’s a business model. They not only want the opposition, the conflict-based economy needs the opposition to survive and it always needs more conflict to prosper.
Defund the Police
The correct term is “de-militarize the police”. Not Defund the police. “Defund” is the wrong word.
De-militarize the police.
Police reform is necessary to prevent the police from being militarized against the public. It’s not that hard to figure out. The real issue is about why people have to protest in the first place. Protests are caused by injustice, which is the government failing to fulfill its responsibility to the public. Justice is the goal of a responsible government. Police are public servants sworn to protect and serve, being used by our government to suppress and oppress the public
The division is intentional, for profit, by design.
When investors profit from oppression the establishment is motivated to increase oppression. It’s common sense.
All conflict should be non-profit.
When people are provoked by injustice and oppressed for profit, the militarized police force becomes the economy. Conflict is the economic engine of that business model. More conflict equals more growth. The establishment invests in oppression and crafts public policy that is oppressive, to increase conflict and make it more profitable, for them.
That is the conflict-based economy.
Democracy threatens the establishment and their profits from the conflict-based economy. That’s why they misinterpret the law when necessary. That’s why the establishment is against democracy. That’s why some people are against education for others. The unfair advantage is to secure financial supremacy for themselves.
The public interest is not the same as the interests of our corporate government, or the politicians and their parties, or their companies and their employees. Their interests are different.
Public versus private.
We are now living in a post-truth society. The entire establishment is conspiring to mislead the public from understanding their democratic potential. That’s because they are in the process of destroying it. Our government is waging a campaign of antidemocratic intention against the public. It’s a war against the public, being waged against us by our own government, and their allies, foreign and domestic.
The news is reporting that the majority of us, or a very clever minority of us, are using our laws and democracy to conspire against us and it looks like they are going to succeed. It looks like they will defeat us and our democracy, in court.
After the court decided that there was no need for states to continue to get federal permission to change their voting laws, guess what happened. The states are all changing their voting laws.
I’m sarcastically surprised.
The court deemed the requirement to fair elections obsolete, apparently, by technicality. The decision being preordained, whether the states had transcended racism or not was irrelevant to the ruling. They ended the law and the previously illegal behavior became the practice. How many times has that happened? And how many of those previous mistakes were intentional?
Like repealing The Glass-Steagall Act, which has corrupted our entire economy. Was that a mistake? No. It was corruption, that screwed the public financially.
How about the normalizing of dark crypto money? Is that a mistake now? Pretending that computers guessing integers has any equivalence to the full faith and credit of taxpayers, is a joke. It’s a political crime in progress, accepted as legal.
How about unlimited political contributions in the name of free corporate speech. Was that mistake? Of course not, nor was the massive public debt that made so many so rich.
Time for a democratic upgrade.
The original voting rights act, that required only some states to seek pre-clearance to change their election laws, was unconstitutional. The voting rights act could have required that all states were to obey voting law regulations equally, but no, it didn’t. If it had, the law would have been constitutional. They could have written the law to withstand legal challenges, but they didn’t. Was that a mistake?
How about the senate retiring the rule that ended debate, which now supposedly prevents a majority vote by waving the magical ‘filibuster’ wand. Was that a mistake? Or even true? No. No it wasn’t.
The filibuster is really just a word that distracts from the unconstitutional senate rule which allows the minority to defeat legislation with majority support. The problem has nothing to do with extended speech or ending debate. The problem is requiring a supermajority to pass legislation.
The problem is senate rule 8.1.
Nobody wants to acknowledge senate rule 8.1. because that rule is unconstitutional and it helps prevent beneficial public policy and a representative government.
The senate filibuster, as incorrectly explained by the professionals, totally confuses the truth. The senate is intentionally misinterpreting their own rules, as a cover story, to avoid identifying the real problem and the discussion that could lead to the correction of rule 8.1.
Notice in the video that Lawrence O’Donnell correctly identifies the procedure in question as the sixty-vote threshold rule. It’s not technically a filibuster, he says, and he’s right. He ignores though, further examination to help you understand the importance of the distinction. Which I will attempt to do here.
Rule 8.1 is the sixty-vote threshold rule. It allows any senator to object to proceeding. An objection is a debatable motion. It takes sixty votes to end debate. The opposition logic is if you don’t have sixty votes to end debate, don’t start the debate or the “filibuster” will never end. The fallacy is that debates always end, by the rules, even filibusters. So the logic is flawed, as interpreted. The minority is requiring sixty votes to end a debate that never starts. If the debate started it would eventually end and the senate would proceed to a majority vote. So what’s happening is the sixty vote threshold to end debate is fraudulently being used on the vote requirement to proceed to debate, which should be a majority.
The misinterpretation can be remedied by removing the right to object to proceeding from senate rule 8.1.
The bottom line of the so-called filibustered cloture vote discussion is this, anything that is not compatible with constitutional intent is illegal, or should be ruled as such by the court for correction. Specifically senate rule 8.1 is need of correction for constitutional compliance.
By requiring 60 votes to proceed the senate deprives the vice-president of the constitutionally mandated tie-breaking authority. That is what makes senate rule 8.1 unconstitutional. Tie-breaking authority requires a majority vote threshold for victory. The intention is self-evident.
The senate has now concocted a new procedure to sanctify the sixty-vote threshold “filibuster” rule as legal, even though it’s not. It builds onto their previous misinterpretation. They refer to it as a cloture vote to proceed to debate, which requires a supermajority to proceed, which prevents majority rule which denies the Vice President of their constitutional authority to break a tie vote in the senate.
The outcome of the voting rights bill would have been reversed if the vp had voted, but she didn’t.
Check the recent procedure in the senate during the vote count on the Voting Rights bill. There was a vote on a motion to proceed that required a supermajority of 60 senators. They called it a cloture vote – simply to change the vote count for victory from 50 to 60, which makes a tie vote impossible, and the vp vote irrelevant.
Proceeding to debate was denied by a cloture vote, which is a vote to close debate. But the debate was never officially started so using the supermajority vote count, normally required to close debate, to prevent proceeding to debate, is an unconstitutional scam.
In reality the voting rights bill was killed by the senate minority because the majority rolled over to a senate rule that is unconstitutional. That is intentional failure.
The voting rights act vote tied in the senate and it was left unbroken by the chair, a democrat, as you know. Let’s dig a little deeper into that and we find the backroom cigar smoke still thick in the air, obfuscating what really happened to the voting rights bill. and what’s the relevance of the vp’s non-vote?
There was no filibuster in this voting rights cloture vote ceremony. It was regular order. Speeches were not extended. Nobody filibustered anything. They just changed the vote count requirement from 50 to 60 to defeat the bill, that’s all. That was the “debate” on voting rights. Even if they called it a cloture vote to proceed, the result is the same. The law failed to pass by a vote in the senate and the minority vote claimed victory even though it was a tie.
The failure of the vp to render a tie-breaking vote on the voting rights bill was never mentioned in the news. She knows how to break a tie, but she decided instead to not vote and declare that the motion to proceed to debate was defeated by a filibuster. The cloture vote to proceed to debate on voting rights was defeated, they said, because they needed 60 votes to pass it.
The truth is the voting rights bill was defeated by the senate allowing an illegal rule that requires a supermajority to proceed. That’s why the bill failed.
If you understand how the rules are supposed to work you would know how preposterous the filibuster logic is. A cloture vote is intended to end debate. It is not intended to obstruct the debate from starting. If you don’t have the debate you can’t have a cloture vote.
Where’s the parliamentarian?
The filibuster is a conspiracy to deprive the public of political solutions by defeating legislation with majority support, as you will see. Notice in the video, the vote count for the voting rights bill, as read by Kamala, is a tie. She doesn’t seem to notice she is being deprived of her constitutionally mandated authority to cast the tie-breaking vote.
Despite the tie, she doesn’t vote.
Kamala doesn’t vote because she is mistakenly conceding her constitutional authority to a senate rule. Senate rule 8.1 is the rule that violates the constitution. The tie vote on the voting rights bill exposes the senate rule as unconstitutional. VP Kamala allegedly concedes her vote to the mistaken assumption that her vote doesn’t matter. She must believe her constitutional authority to break the tie has been superseded by the senate filibuster rule, or she would vote. Right?
The tie-breaking vp abstained from casting a tie-breaking vote because of the filibuster, aka the supermajority rule, that is also unconstitutional by proper interpretation.
If Kamala would have voted yes on the voting rights bill the democrats would have won. She could have broken the senate tie, despite having to break the promises she undoubtedly made to her undemocratic colleagues. No doubt she promised she would not do that, but she should have. She could have saved our democracy by betraying her colleagues, but she didn’t.
Kamala conceded her authority to vote in order to appease the republican moles that have infiltrated the democratic caucus in the senate. She didn’t break the tie so the majority leader, Schumer, could claim party unity, as they failed.
If the VP had voted yes and broke the tie, Biden could then have signed his voting rights for the people act into law. That would have ultimately forced the court to rule on the so-called “Filibuster” rule, which at the very least would have proven the problem is not the filibuster at all. The problem could then be targeted for legislative correction.
Voting rights law will likely continue to fail in the future despite amended versions being watered down and gutted of ethical regulations and common sense, to appease the corrupt.
Even if the senate passes a voting rights law, it will fail for the public. The establishment will see to that. The solutions are simple and have been cited, yet ignored in perpetuity.
The establishment resists political solutions.
Because of the corrupted corporate court, It’s now every state for themselves. The states can dictate their voter suppression plans without federal concern or intervention. That was the result of what the senate did when it killed voting rights legislation, with their unconstitutional rule.
The tie-breaking power given to the president of the senate makes the constitutional intention of majority vote self-evident.
Calling senate rule 8.1 a filibuster is a big lie to disguise the fact that Rule 8.1 is illegal. It is unconstitutional because it prevents majority rule, as the constitution intends. The establishment intentionally confuses that fact.
The filibuster is not the problem.
A super majority makes sense to close debate and to end a filibuster. Those vote counts don’t violate the constitution and they serve to protect the minority from a tyrannical majority. But now, the senate is requiring a super-majority to proceed to debate. That’s different. That violates constitutional intent and majority vote.
Rule 8.1 needs to be corrected by law, or by the Supreme Court..
The problem is a conspiracy to maintain minority rule. The senators debate as if they are debating but call it a cloture vote. It’s essentially the same as a debate, but they don’t call it that. They call it a motion to proceed to debate and apply the 60 vote count requirement from the post-debate cloture vote in order to subvert majority rule. It’s a simplistic ruse being used against the public to subvert democracy.
A super majority to proceed to consideration of anything is a joke. That is rule by minority, and by an honest interpretation, that is not legal here. Yet that is what is happening. The blatant misuse of the filibuster alone exposes the adversarial relationship of our government to the law, and to the public, and to the democracy they are sworn to protect and defend.
Violation of Constitutional Intention
A motion to proceed is logically determined by majority vote. There’s no such thing as a cloture vote on a motion to proceed in the senate rules, because the cloture vote count requirement assumes you are concluding the debate. If you haven’t even proceeded to debate a cloture vote is out of order. The senate logic is garbage yet it’s being accepted as a reason to prevent passage of legislation supported by the majority.
President Joe Biden suggesting something is more important than declaring rule 8.1 illegal and unconstitutional exposes his allegiance to voter suppression. The president, being against abolishing the filibuster, is allied with the same right-wing state legislatures he has been warning us about. Is that a mistake?
Everybody says legislative obstruction is because of the filibuster, when it’s not. That’s a scam and everybody is in on it, including Joe, intentionally or not. It’s the only logical conclusion. The establishment is against majority rule and they are against an honest democracy. An honest democracy requires majority rule, at the least.
The misinterpreted filibuster debacle proves that the establishment is an adversary to constitutional intention and by extension an adversary to the public. We need to legislate better corrections to achieve a constitutionally compliant government. Yet instead, as I write this, our public servants are legislating voter suppression and deregulating ethics for consequence-free corruption.
The procedural exceptions to a supermajority vote in the senate exposes the arbitrary interpretation of the rules and how they are executed with nefarious antidemocratic intent. Whether by reconciliation, the nuclear option, sweetheart carveouts, or whatever you want to call the exceptions to the current supermajority paradigm, is proof that the rules are ridiculous, arbitrary, and obstructionist.
The senate rules are whatever the leadership says they are. Those are the rules. The problem is the public leaders serve the special interests and the extraction scam, not the public or democracy. So they misinterpret the rules against the public to benefit the corrupt.
Democracy could be saved if the democrats insisted on it, but they won’t. Instead they’re going to borrow some more money, causing more debt and inflation, and as usual, they’ll borrow the money from those who refuse to pay any taxes.
Despite Biden’s rhetoric of taxing billionaires for the money we need for infrastructure, the government will pay them for the privilege of using their money. Then the government will contract their corporate services for the public’s infrastructure needs, with that money. They’ll say they’re taxing big money, but they’re not. You can almost hear the giant sucking sound from the money funnel perpetually over-hemorrhaging the public treasury. It’s like sucking an empty milkshake through a long straw, but less gratifying.
Gurgles and Bubbles.
To recap, senate rule 8.1 is unconstitutional and it needs to be corrected by the court because the senate refuses to fix it. The media refuses to define the problem properly and if the court heard the testimony, it would become obvious what the problem really is. Once identified, the problem could be targeted for legislative correction, regardless of the court’s ruling. Eventually the “rule” could be corrected.
But instead of fixing the problem the problem is disguised by being misidentified. The entire establishment has conspired against the public, the constitution, majority vote, and democracy itself, by misdefining the filibuster.
The only political solution potent enough now to matter is tax bracket apportionment, or the like. We need a new apportionment act to save our democracy from its enemies. Voter suppression and electoral subversion are antidemocratic strategies that must be prevented if democracy is to survive.
United States citizens are guaranteed, by the constitution, a constitutional republic. The federal government is preventing that from happening while conspiring with the states to legislate more oppressive voter suppression laws, against the public, to constrain democracy.
The organization that is salivating for maximum extraction through legislative action does not have the public voters interest in mind. They are hell bent on sustaining a monolithic authority to control state governments. That will give them the power to dictate federal law. It ain’t rocket science. It’s a political crime in progress. It’s a conspiracy.
Here’s how to fix the “filibuster problem”:
RULE VIII (currently preventing majority vote) ORDER OF BUSINESS .. bills and resolutions that are not objected to shall be taken up in their order, ..
RULE VIII (corrected for majority vote) ORDER OF BUSINESS .. bills and resolutions shall be taken up in their order, ..
With that rule change a supermajority would be required to prevent proceeding. That’s how simple it is.
What really amazes me is the same government that made unlimited contributions to themselves legal, and made easy money way too available, for themselves, now say they are trying to protect our voting rights while they legislate against our voting rights. And people supposedly believe them.
The democrats are the willing patsies in this gag. They are going to lose and say they tried, as usual. I assume some of them will actually try, but they will fail. Like I said, there has never been an honest democracy.
President Biden has surrendered the filibuster battle as he warns us of election subversion. That’s a new concern, he explains, that gives state governments the right to choose who wins their elections. If they don’t like the results, the state legislatures will simply overturn the elections, he said, implying the federal government has no jurisdiction.
The duopoly was never concerned about vote counts before but now it’s clear the political system is being taken over by intruders. Joe might think he’s still working with his old buddies but he’s not. The intruders are not your father’s Republican Party, Joe. Your old friends have mostly retired by now with the spoils of their looted booty. Those who were inclined to stick around and those who have just signed up are currently preparing to destroy for good, what’s left of our dishonest democracy.
Joe Biden said ending the filibuster would cause chaos. So he’s against it, which exposes all you need to know about his antidemocratic intentions. Despite his warnings and concerns of electoral subversion strategies that will destroy democracy forevermore, he finds the filibuster, incorrectly, necessary.
What a perfect time to save our democracy with a new apportionment act. It’s never been more important. But we are helpless now to stop the states from legislating against us, ostensibly in reaction to the big lie, if you can believe that.
The big lie was where the republicans pretended that demonic child molesters stole the election from president Trump. They will make sure the “socialist” democrats don’t steal any elections in the future, they say.
The republicans are going to legally monopolize the path to public office for themselves, in the state legislatures. And the Dems will be helpless to stop them, forevermore. The corporate incumbency will entrench themselves so deep they will be able to legally withstand any amount of majority opposition. If that should happen, and you know it will, how is that not the overthrow of democracy?
I think the lie is much bigger and premeditated, contrived and scripted to perpetuate the conflict based economy. The professional narrative is a fairy-tale that serves as a veil to hide the truth from the public. The truth becomes more apparent to more people as our history becomes more accessible and understood by them. The digital revolution is changing everything, and they knew it would.
It’s August, 2021 and the public division keeps increasing. There’s still no solutions in sight, other than printing money and voter suppression. Election subversion laws are on the rise in state houses across the country, while Wall Street buys our land with money extracted from our futures. Political solutions for the public seem futile.
There’s a long list of mayoral candidates here, all running on the same empty promises we’ve all heard before many times over along the way, on our way to this society of ever-increasing social dysfunction. It seems pretty intentional, to me. This is how we do it and it keeps getting worse. The public will continue to lose no matter who wins. That could be changed. Those policies could be corrected.
Wall Street is making record profits while millions of people are being evicted from their homes, as predicted. Is that a mistake?
The federal eviction moratorium, due to the pandemic, is expiring and the 50 billion dollars that was appropriated to landlords has disappeared into state slush funds, apparently. That’s about a thousand millionaires in every state created with more taxpayer debt. Our money has been institutionally siphoned off and used to curry corrupt favor amongst the well-connected cronies of the establishment, I suspect.
Nice gig if you can get it.
The eviction moratorium was postponed for two months apparently because a cute family on the eve of eviction was featured on primetime news and well to do news viewers contributed a quarter million dollars to their plight. It was a nationally broadcast ‘go fund me’ tragedy feel good segment, which concluded with a big egg on your face non-family admission. “Refunds will be pending”. It shows the corporate media has way too much power and influence over public opinion while at the same time supposedly having very little influence over our public policy. They could advocate for policy that would prevent that situation from happening in the first place, to any family, but they don’t.
Corporate media audience sizes need to be explored much further, legally and philosophically, to better understand the options to our current monopolistic paradigm.
It’s not being reported that unlimited debt is being used as an economic weapon to buy our houses and our land, as well as our companies and infrastructure.
Rest assured the sheriffs will be saddling up soon and the evictions will begin. The homeless population will increase, as predicted. The division and the chaos will continue.
Speaking of which, it looks like we’ve been evicted from Afghanistan and the Taliban is moving back in. It’s hard to know the truth, but it looks like we have begun “pulling out”.
We are just leaving now, amidst chaos and violence, without any apologies for the mistake of invading them in the first place, or forcing them to fight each other.
We have occupied their country and trained them for a generation to fight each other and now Joe Biden says they must continue to fight, without us. Afghanistan is a perfect example of how the conflict-based economy has made a mockery of our democracy in service to corruption. Some people are forced to fight so that others will prosper.
The chaotic evacuation from Afghanistan is an intentional distraction from the history of the occupation and corruption. We knew this would happen and we knew it was happening. That should be the focus of hearings now. How and why is such massive corruption tolerated?
The protests have long been forgotten.
A civil war will likely be next for Afghanistan, or if history is any guide, and it is, maybe a genocide. We’ll be leaving behind enough weaponry to arm their conflicts for at least a generation. The news is reporting we have abandoned our allies and armed our enemies, as if that’s something new.
Why again did we do that? revenge for 9/11? Sure we did. Two decades later the facts about that terrible day are still murky, as is the burial at sea, with religious honors, we gave to the alleged mastermind and perpetrator of that attack.
And those who advocated for such a horrible mistake, as to invade Afghanistan in the first place, they will continue to get off scott-free. Their war chests of compounded investments will continue to grow and corrupt our public policy further.
We are being bombed into confusion by friendly-fire, it seems. At least that is if you believe we’re all in this together. I don’t. Most of the public suffers from the policies of the government, whether they know it or not, because our government is being controlled by, and serves, corporate interests instead of the public interest.
It’s time to stop saying “that’s just the way things are” and demand an adequate voting system and a valid democracy. You don’t stop electoral fraud with voter suppression laws, as is being done. You stop electoral fraud with a safe and secure electoral system that is nationally capable and locally verifiable.
An electoral system could be inserted into the infrastructure bill, and passed by majority. But it won’t be.
Our conventional wisdom is full of obvious contradictions which are consistently ignored by the professionals. The synergy of deception here in this post-truth dystopia is truly enough to shock the conscience, if you think about it. Most people don’t. But if you do you gotta be confused because the logic is irreconcilable, at best.
If you look close enough you can see the economic vampires are actually corporate lizards. The QE has saturated the top now, with money, and it trickles down like a steady flow of snow from a tall frosty mountain for the privileged few. The money dries up before it hits the valley though, where most of the public struggles to survive.
The prosperous but moral-hazard laden lifeblood resides in the markets for some, while most people suffer the inflationary consequences of the lizard-friendly monetary policy. Investor wealth is skyrocketing. We have billionaires flying into space, burning up their un-taxed dollars. Dollars that should be funding our economy and going to infrastructure jobs. The astro-garch apparently gave hundreds of millions of dollars to media pundits for their blessings, as a gesture of good promotion.
The hyper-partisan news networks collectively celebrated the privatized space mission as something normal and non-partisan. They contend the government doesn’t have enough money to go into space like billionaires do, without questioning the underlying logic that makes such a hideous thing true. That’s just how it is, apparently. Now let’s thank our lizard overlords for their benevolance. Someday investors might profit off of sending each other into space. Isn’t that great?
It’s a long sordid story of monopoly I hope to tackle soon. For now I just had to mention the shameless vampires declaring their fears of the viral variant as the reason the market dropped 700 points the other day. What really happened was the president told them to pay their fair share, so they pretended to be scared by pulling some profits. Predictably, their fears quickly faded and the DOW has rebounded now like the pandemic is over, despite reports of another viral wave looming large.
What is so absurd is what the lizards say to rationalize market movements. The past year has proven the virus, or the lack of economic growth, has nothing to do with the market movement. The market moves up based on the taxpayer extraction scam being safe, and goes down when it’s threatened. When president Biden declared the unfairness of the corporate welfare scam the vampires took a big sloppy suck out of the money pool, and said, “Ya better shut up if you want this index to keep going up, mr. president.”
Keep feeding the taxpayer money to the monster mr. president, or else, is the unspoken threat. The media will continue to pretend the bipartisan golden goose doesn’t have fangs and the public is not being sucked dry of their economic representation by this quantative monster. But make no mistake, that’s what’s happening. The government keeps going further into debt, for the taxpayers, as the subsidized billionaires litteraly fly off into space with the public’s money. Oh yeah, the market is so worried about a covid resurgence. It’s a variant of the virus that brought the market to record highs. Oh they were so scared, for a day.
A quick note to say my recent filibuster entries were criminally removed from the activity stream of this website. So I took the time to copy and paste the links and titles back into it, for the record, for a properly sequenced timeline, but no. Some jerk-wad hacker removed those too. I was hacked again. That’s how important the idiotic conventional wisdom of the misinterpreted filibuster argument is, I guess, to them. It really dampens the motivation to post or update the site further knowing political hack puppets can come along and delete my work with a few clicks. It’s another unaccountable violation normalized in this monopolized system and another example of how ridiculously vulnerable the internet is, by design. The internet, like our society, is designed for exploitation by nefarious intentions. I suspect the activity stream ranks better in search algorithms compared to my politically blacklisted articles and blog posts. So the “powers that be” delete my activity to censor language they don’t want people to hear.
So I’m discouraged but not done. I’m not defeated, per say. Just overworked and underpaid, as usual. Still, It’s worth repeating here, especially after having been deleted, the mutated filibuster rationale is being justified by misinterpretation and everybody is in on it. The presiding officer of the senate can rule any filibuster out of order anytime they want. It is literally the difference of saving our democracy, or not, and our defenders are ready to surrender it to a procedural strategy that is implausible and unconstitutional. It is the most obvious betrayal of our constitution one can imagine, by those sworn to defend it. But, nobody notices. All of the explanations and justifications I’ve heard are wrong, and I’ve heard them all. This betrayal is especially important because the majority vote intention of the constitution, and democracy itself, is that important. Everybody should demand that the senate rules be compliant with the constitution and its majority vote intention. But nobody does, apparently, but me. Them’s the rules, they say, when they’re not. Notice how the necessary rule change is never defined. Unfortunately, without a majority, it’s all a moot point.
I’ll get back to the filibuster asap.
There’s so many plot-points of massive importance being reported with deceptive and blatant bias recently. The insurrection investigation, the coronavirus bailout, The crypto economy, and so much more. All of which are not what they seem, as reported by independents and corporate shills alike.
Corrective commentary is needed asap, imo.
Tonight though I have to add a word about Juneteenth. It’s a new word to me, despite being a news junkie. I first heard it a few days ago and now it’s a national holiday, just like that. It’s been foist upon our collective consciousness like the adoption of an unexpected family member. You’re like, what? If there was any debate about it, I didn’t hear it.
Which brings up another point. The house should be holding hearings on all kinds of things, but they don’t. So much legislation to sell and so much disinformation to correct, with too few hearings being held, is negligent and very suspect at the least. It’s congressional dereliction. In light of the failing Biden agenda, they should be holding hearings to expose the truth wherever and whenever possible.
But, Juneteenth is a federal holiday now, out of nowhere. Apparently federal workers will get another paid holiday now because some Texas dirtbags disobeyed the law. My first thought is why not have a holiday celebrating the thirteenth amendment? That law made slavery illegal. Clearly, that’s the act that should be recognized annually for celebration, not slave-holding dirt-baggery by Texas supremacists, or even their failure.
What is this government thinking? The states are legislating voter suppression and the federal government appears powerless to stop them. Juneteenth reeks of inadequate appeasement to counter the critical race theory sweeping the country, but it won’t. The notion that our history and American institutions are inherently racist is hard to deny. Those who continue to enjoy their excessive privileges, white people or otherwise, won’t likely even try. They prefer to not hear the grievance, as a strategy.
Lincoln proclaiming emancipation for confederate slaves should be celebrated as the most heroic deed relevant to our society attempting to transcend slavery. That would be an appropriate national holiday. It makes Juneteenth a footnote, at best, by comparison.
A holiday recognizing Texas dragging their slave-holding feet against emancipation is an outrage of historical proportions, imo, regardless of who celebrates their failure. Texas should be ashamed for defying the law, but they’re not. I’m sure many of them are still proud of what they did back then, as Texans. Juneteenth is a recognition of supremacist resistance to end slavery. Federal holidays should be reserved for legislative victories and achievements towards democratic success.
Speaking of Texan dirt-baggery, after JFK was killed in Dallas, we should have sold Texas to Mexico and exploited Texans for cheap labor in an ironic retribution for that assassination. They’re destined for Mexican-style democracy anyway. We should encourage them to go.
Surely, I jest. But that brings me to the more important point.
Federal holidays should be guaranteed to any president that is assassinated in office or murdered afterwards, or killed while campaigning for office. Their holidays should be celebrated on their birthdays with every worker getting the day off, paid for by taxing the extremely wealthy. All national holidays should be paid vacations for everybody, not just federal workers, and they should be paid for with a wealth tax, exclusively, to benefit the public.
One way to understand the eternal struggle of humanity is the public versus private paradigm, where one side prospers at the other’s expense. Presidents are typically assassinated to profit private interests, or so it seems. The motivation to assassinate public leaders could be neutralized by assigning a financial penalty to profitable private interests when that happens, regardless of guilt. If public leaders are harmed physically, private interests should pay dearly and directly, financially, for the public loss. A holiday for everybody paid for by the extremely wealthy could be a deterrent to criminal actions against the public by private interests. It’s worth a try.
What sense does it make to give another paid holiday to federal workers because slaveholders in Texas refused to recognize that their unethical behavior and repugnant economy had become criminal, years before? A federal holiday for that makes little sense comparatively, yet there it is. For most of us it doesn’t change anything.
I just spent some time reading about Jubilee days and Juneteenth also being a celebration day of black culture. I’m still not convinced it’s the proper day or reason for a federal holiday despite previous celebrations, but there’s no point now in quibbling. I applaud the victory, however minor it might be. I’m sure it will provide hope and meaning to many and that alone is valuable, to them, at least.
We should be smarter about the things we recognize for holiday celebrations. I won’t take the time to compare other holidays and what motivated them, but there’s plenty of debate that should occur to ensure we celebrate the right things as we attempt to move forward in unified purpose, for justice. Like voting, it should be a national holiday. The ratification of the constitution could be another important holiday to impress upon future generations the importance of democracy. The courageous people who officially made democracy our law should be celebrated by us forevermore as the greatest generation of patriots, ever. Their efforts should be annually juxtaposed with those who erroneously think they are patriots while betraying our democracy or preventing its potential.
Citizens need to better understand the difference between the quest for justice and the quest for money and how those competing interests actually conflict with each other. Private money corrupts democracy. That understanding is self-evident. That would help define the struggle for corrective legislation. Federal holidays should make clear that we celebrate achievements towards a more perfect union that promotes the general welfare with laws towards peace, justice, and equality, by democratic means.
Celebrations of cultures are nice, but not necessarily beneficial to our collective struggle for democratic representation, nor do they rise to the importance of a federal holiday, imo. Juneteenth will actually cloud the ongoing struggle of humanity by pretending the struggle is over, or close to it. Like Clarence replacing Marshall on the bench, or Obama becoming president. Our collective progress is debatable. We will now supposedly begin to celebrate black culture as a holiday once a year, if we can afford it, as we legislate voter suppression against those who can’t. We will continue to discriminate against those who lack the adequate representation to celebrate economic emancipation, regardless of their race. And that should be recognized for what it is, inadequate.
I just watched a news bit with Brian Williams interviewing Mellisa Ryan about the growing white power movement. She says they, along with conspiracy theorists, were those identified as the insurrectionists who stormed the capital last January, to stop the steal.
Stop the steal was promoted by the Q’s and chanted by insurrectionists as they stormed the capital building. The alleged election fraud now being called “the big lie” was the reason the mob tried to prevent the ceremonial counting of the electors, they say.
That’s a long story just getting started.
Apparently Mellisa has written an article for the Progressive about all that and more. She seems to be informed so I thought I’d give it a read.
The first sentence is a powerhouse and presented above the artwork to emphasize just how awesome it is. Like the title, I like it. So far.
She writes,
“State and local republican parties have been taken over by white supremacists, conspiracy mongers, and insurrectionists.”
Ok, let’s break this down,
The first sentence paints a good visual, but is either misguided or it is professionally crafted disinformation, maybe both. I’m only on the first sentence here and I don’t want to get bogged down or pre-judge the article, but I can’t proceed without dissecting this first sentence. It’s so good. It must be professional disinformation.
I won’t speculate as to her intent, yet, but,
First of all she accuses a coalition of white supremacists and conspiracy mongers and insurrectionists of taking over the Republican Party. As if the Republican Party has not been exactly that for about ever now.
Their track record is clear.
I guess the establishment assumes that after eight years of Obama nobody remembers what the republicans did before him, I do.
I won’t cite their history, here.
I will say in our monetary system supremacy is measured financially, not racially. So white supremacy is misleading. So is conspiracy mongers. Nobody “mongers” for a conspiracy. What she is saying is the same as racist liars. The republicans are being overthrown by racist liars, is what she is saying. She chooses to call the liars conspiracy theorists even though she knows they are lying. They are lying about losing an election. That’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s a lie.
They lost the election and they say they won. The problem is neither side can’t prove it to the other’s satisfaction. Election fraud claims will grow until the government provides a citizens network in accordance to our democratic needs. It needs to be accessible and verifiable with no anonymous activity. Don’t trust anybody who’s against it.
The republicans are different now, she implies, because they’re lying. Wrong. They have always lied. Some of them have begun to openly embrace their own supremacy. Some still try to hide it. Either way, denial or not, voter suppression has always been their political strategy.
Republican ideology is financial supremacy and it has been for a long time. Becoming cartoonish villains to protect and defend their anti-democratic agenda was inevitable, sooner or later.
Almost everybody concedes to what the republicans stand for so why not openly embrace their supremacy? That’s who they are. That’s their team. It’s a big tent. They’re going to run supremacy up the flagpole and see who salutes. And make note of who doesn’t.
The Republican Party is splitting, they say, into two different camps; the shameless shills embracing their beloved leader and those who prefer to remain in denial of their shameful past.
As if that makes them different. It doesn’t. Frankenstein is letting his monster out of the closet. It’s a trial balloon to measure public reaction. Now you can vote for the unmasked monster, directly.
The republicans have always had a corporate agenda to maximize private profits from public extraction. That’s what unites them. Bipartisanship is why we have increasing inequality.
Financial supremacy will remain the primary republican motive, for Frankenstein and his monster, divided or not.
Open resistance to the truth, democracy, and the law, is not a new strategy for republicans. Nor is winning elections by fraud, despite the establishment selling it as something new.
The Q’s assent to supremacy is hedged by their other wing that remains in denial. The old guard and the crazies are still one party unified against their opposition, democracy. If the shameless liar strategy doesn’t get the votes, they can huddle back up with those pretending to be against lying and adjust as necessary.
Public acceptance of fascism is their goal. The next step in a long line of undemocratic steps that define the republicans for what they are, financial or otherwise, is supremacist pride. They must openly embrace their sinister beliefs if they are to achieve true supremacy.
The republicans farm their opposition with public policies that feed their victims into the conflict-based economy, for profits. The democrats try to regulate them if possible, for the public. There is an alternative to all that, based on a healthy economy for everybody.
Our socioeconomic design needs to change and the only way to change it is to fix our democracy. With a citizen network, accessible and secure, giving us a verifiable consensus, we could begin to fix our democracy.
We don’t need new leaders we need a new high-tech consensus system. We need an electoral infrastructure to provide a post-digital democracy if we are to save “democracy” from its enemies.
Antiquated electoral technology is voter suppression.
The parties are hunkering down now in self-preservation because the the population keeps growing and the wealth extraction scam is not sustainable. Something is gonna give.
Our democracy, probably.
The republicans gather for their secret meetings and strategize their supremacy, while the democrats recruit “the resistance”. Those from the public who can donate their time and money to oppose the republican agenda support the democrats. Inequality defines the division.
The idea we need a two-party system for an opposing viewpoint would be valid if at least one party actually represented the public honestly, and economically. They don’t. The democrats represent the same shareholders as the republicans do, but republicans don’t represent Main Street at all, except in rhetoric. Republicans vote unanimously against the public to profit their sponsors, I’ve noticed.
Back to Mellissa’s first sentence. I have a concern with lumping supremacy in with conspiracy theory. Supremacy is the opposite of a conspiracy theory. A supremacist believes they deserve to control the institution. A conspiracy theorist questions the validity of institutional truth. They are opposites by definition. A supremacist doesn’t care about the truth. The implication is that there is an equivalence to the two motives, or a coalition, when there’s not. That conventional wisdom is demonization by association and therefore, disinformation.
Seventy million conspiracy theorists don’t believe the outcome of the last election was valid. That’s because our electoral system is inadequate. The resistance to a post-digital democratic upgrade is the problem in need of correction.
And lastly, her opening sentence implies that these people went from waving confederate flags in the capital to taking over the local party, as opposed to the other way around. Sorry, these paranoid flag waving liars have always controlled “their” party, or their parents did. The result is the same, either way. Some of them got to vacation at the capital this year for the big Storm the Capital event. Insurrectionists? Maybe a small fraction of them, by definition.
Anyway, let’s give this a read.
Looks like a deep dive into some of the specifics about the cast and their crimes. It’s also a testament to the militarization of our homeland. Which coincidently coincides with the republican voter suppression efforts.
I’d put 2 + 2 together, but who’s counting?
The plot to militarize the homeland and prevent the public from voting started a long time ago.
So now the right wing racist militia movements will become the republicans and the democrats will serve as the party of old corporate cronies or something like that. Steady as she goes, hard to the right.
The left gets left out.
After skimming over a ton of detail in her article I have read enough to know Melissa deserves an award. She has clearly spent a ton of time documenting details and sharing her insights about the inevitable surrender to, and overthrow of our government by, organized supremacists, who also apparently believe in conspiracy theories, they say. As if that’s relevant. As if they themselves are not a conspiracy.
Her article, without saying as much, points out the fallacy of our democratic process. A political system based on money will inevitably create more money for those who control it.
When an antidemocratic organization controls your democracy you don’t have a democracy.
The money flows to those who control the system. Those that control the system, control it for the money. This organized conspiracy she’s talking about is not motivated by racism, like she says. It is enabled by and for the money that sustains their supremacy. They recruit racists and hillbillies dumb enough to promote their ideology, as a distraction from the motive of money. The hillbillies are happy to volunteer, pushing their racism and fear as their motive that threatens the violence, which fuels the conflict-based economy.
Melissa suggests that if we’re concerned about our democracy we should get involved with local politics. I’m for that, but she sounds like a party recruiter. Join the democratic resistance to help oppose the militant skin-heads gearing up to kick your ass for the Q’s, and the cause. The democrats will vote away the Q’s and their quest for supremacy, supposedly, with your help.
I don’t think it’s too much to expect that the local politicians will do the right thing. But now here they are, apparently, passing voter suppression laws at a rapid and harmonious rate in almost every state. Just like the Q’s are already running the show. It’s like it was planned this way, by those doing it now, a long time ago.
It’s been an intergenerational goal, or plot, if you prefer. It should be acknowledged and corrected, democratically, if possible.
Like the civil rights act recently being ruled unconstitutional, declaring some states, but not all, no longer must report election law changes to the AG. Now that the court overturned that one, all of the states can change the law however they like, apparently, suppressing the vote as determined locally, by those who are doing so very well. The government could have easily written the law for constitutional compliance, by making every state report instead of just some, but they didn’t. The law was written to fail. And it did.
The state governments all think that voter suppression is the legislative answer to the big lie. That’s exactly the wrong thing to do. As usual.
It’s like thinking censorship can validate your opinion by denying the existence of the counterpoint. It can’t. It doesn’t.
We’re all in this together, they say, except Trump and the 70 million people who still think he was robbed by democrats at the last election. Let’s censor them, they say. We don’t have to prove anything, ever. Is what they must be thinking. Let’s give out some money.
That’s their plan, apparently, for now.
This is a perfect opportunity for a citizen’s network as previously described. Locally operated servers in every district, for a voting system that is national and that is verifiable locally. It’s so simple, and so obvious, and so overdue.
I’ve had to remove a few paragraphs of praise for the president from this post. I’m a sucker for good rhetoric, like most, and I must have been drinking the night he gave this speech. It sounded good at the time.
I heard today he’s sending troops to Ukraine. He’s pulling them from Afghanistan, they say, and sending them to Ukraine. I haven’t heard him say that but that is what was reported. And it’s believable, we’ll see. Until then, I’m retracting my praise of honesty and sincerity and will revert to calling him and the democrats the lesser of two evils.
Still, just by claiming he’s in opposition to the enemies of democracy, Joe becomes a hero in this narrative. That is an important distinction between the two parties. The democrats do their best to tell the truth and hide their lies, republicans don’t. The republicans will pretend they told the truth even when they know everybody else knows they are lying.
They don’t care.
The problem, as deceptively sold by the republican rebuttal, is the opposition doesn’t like democracy. It’s almost comical to watch republicans pretend that they do, or ever have. I won’t pretend to believe their opinions deserve any serious consideration because their past tells their truth. Their ideology has been supremacy for a long time.
It must be noted though, the rewriting of history to pretend somehow that the Trump admin was worse than his republican predecesors, because of the Big Lie, or whatever reason they want to come up with, is ridiculous. We’ll get back to that another day. The republicans have been consistently antidemocratic for a very long time. You can bank on them staying that way. All of them. It’s what they do.
The corporate lizards actually believe they earn their money, deservedly, and comparatively, as a form of meritocratic reward for their talents and extra efforts. They earned it by working hard, they believe. The idea that their economic relationships in a rigged economy resulted in their unfair advantage never really crosses their mind for consideration, or it’s quickly dismissed, I’m sure.
So Joe must walk a fine line of appeasement or the opposition will get upset. And who knows what they might do? I’ll just tip-toe around all that for now and focus on the president’s address.
I agree with him, mostly. The first line that bothered me was when he asked why we can’t build our own electric cars and batteries. The comment is so rhetorically obvious that to not answer it ignores the decades of outsourcing that we did, and still do. As if he doesn’t know.
Who is responsible for that? Wall Street.
Any rhetorical question a politician asks regarding why we pay way more than everybody else for institutional goods and services, the answer is, blame Wall Street. That is likely the correct answer. It’s the fat-cat bankers maximizing thier own shareholder value that divides us, which forces our elected officials to serve them, instead of the public.
Joe has so many grand ideas. We’re going to cure cancer he says, and create blue collar jobs with unions and have a minimum wage. He should have added, guaranteed for all, but he didn’t. Employment should be guaranteed, imo.
The Family Plan, he says, guarantees four more years of public education. I think it’s a good idea but it won’t pass. None of it will. So why not go for it and dream big. We want publicly funded credentialed curriculum accessible to everybody as part of our citizen network, which also allows citizens to vote and pay taxes as simply and conveniently as technology can provide.
Joes’ family plan also promises subsidized child care and tax credits, he says, which is all good, but that could also be better, imo. If the free market makes childcare too expensive compared to a parent’s wage, then the free market is inadequate, and in need of correction.
The economy is rigged to make some people’s time way more valuable than others. That inequality is what needs to be corrected for an ethical economy. If we can fix our democracy, we can fix our economy.
Why don’t we negotiate drug prices? That question always gets an applause but, like our economy, the problem is never fixed. We pay three times as much as other countries for our drugs. Why is that?
You should know this. The answer was six paragraphs back.
Q: What does The federal reserve, crypto-currency, and q-anon, all have in common?
A: They are all conspiracy theories, or not, depending on what you believe.
Imagine playing monopoly with a lizard who has unlimited money for himself and he uses that money to buy everything on the board before you ever even get a chance to roll the dice. Them’s the rules, he says. Pay up. You work hard and start a business, but then you find out he’s franchised your competition and everybody is investing in your failure, so you do. You apply for a job with the corporation but they’re not hiring, you. So you seek public assistance and start drinking and get angry. Eventually, your family breaks up and you end up living in your car until it breaks down. And then you find yourself looking around for a good place to pitch your tent, for the night. Just then, a wave of dirty rain water from a mud puddle gets splashed up into your face and you watch a luxurious sports tank speed away. The corporate lizard laughs as he rolls his overpriced auto investment down the road, checking the current scam-coin price and speculating that there is a conspiracy being perpetrated against him, by you and your government of socialist wannabees.
Welcome to the grand scam. Wall Street vs. Main Street.
Truth is not a prerequisite when practicing the ideology of supremacy. Belief is truth enough, for some, no matter how wrong they are. It’s been a political strategy to ignore social remedy for a long time.
In the beginning the value of money was determined by gold weight. It wasn’t perfect but the value of currency was stable. Most people worked for their money and put it in the bank. And then the bankers “invested” that money to profit themselves. They made fortunes but the bank deposits just “disappeared”, they said, causing an economic depression.
The government printed up a bunch of money to cover the missing deposits and the bankers got to keep their ill-gotten gains. The scam became a business model, based on inflation and extraction, which has been practiced ever since.
(The establishment profits on inflation by devaluing the currency and increasing inequality. The money is worth less but they have a lot more of it, comparatively, so it’s a profitable strategy, for them.)
The scammers got rich. Depositors got paid back with public debt.
Then in 1971, they say, the scam was unsustainable and we had to cut loose of the gold standard. Our fiat currency was born and debts were then paid, and prosperity was made, by over-leveraging the full faith and credit of future taxpayers and the belief that “growth” would be able to perpetually pick up the tab for “our” excessive prosperity. It was a lucrative plan for many, for a long time. The extaction scam was normalized and continues to this day.
Growth versus Extraction
Inequality and Inflation predictably continue to increase, along with the massive spending and debt. Instead of taxing the corporations making fortunes from the public debt, the government borrows from them, and pays them back by borrowing more, and by raising prices, devaluing money, and increasing inequality, and of course, by counterfieting, which causes inflation.
Pyramid schemes can work well for a long time until those at the top get too greedy and that’s what’s happened here. The failure of the scam was inevitable. The problem is the scam is vulnerable now, to correction by democratic regulations. Those who manage the scam need a more secure method of extraction moving forward, if the scam is to survive.
Scam? What scam?
What can we do to franchise the economy further for more corporate profits? How do we launder trillions of extracted and dark money dollars without oversight? And how do we completely abandon the public and their hyper-inflated and quickly crumbling currency? And most importantly, how do we prove that their “socialist” policies are to blame for this entire mess, and not us? Is what they’ve been thinking.
Introducing Crypto, the privatized currency market.
The king lizard compares crypto-currency to gold. As if random computer calculations are the equivalent to precious metals. The lizard is out to lunch. A ten martini gold plated luxury lunch paid for with the fiat profits extracted from future taxpayers, I would suspect. He’s totally disconnected from reality while pretending this massive financial conspiracy is normal. The chairman is a master of the lizard language. He doesn’t lie but he never tells the truth, that matters.
Allowing for a private currency based on nothing is a mockery of everything that has ever been ethical. It is an unconstitutional threat to the root of our security and should be outlawed immediately.
The so-called crypto-currency gets its value by defying the law. It’s not a currency at all. It is a wannabe currency. Every dime invested in crypto-currency scams should be confiscated by authorities, imho, and profitable investors should be targeted for audits.
Privatized currency is illegal here. So don’t call it a currency. It’s an investment scam with no underlying value.
Some people have too much money.
Of course the headline is satirical but if the fed started buying crypto-currency nobody would even bat an eye of counterpoint concern. Everybody would jump in and make a ton of money, ultimately extracted from taxpayers, who will remain oblivious to the scam.
Bad bets will be retroactively insured by taxpayers, as usual.
Cyrpto-currencies are an indictment of both our financial system and justice system. It shows there is no limit now to the shameless and blatant scamming that is allowed by the lack of oversight and legal restraint. I don’t see the problem, they say.
Those in justice are invested in the scam. Their conflict of interest is self-evident and so are their results. Our current economy is proof enough that our democracy needs an upgrade, asap, to recognize that money is representation and to apportion representatives accordingly.
Constitutional scholars are also heavily invested in the scam. Maybe not Crypto yet, but they depend on the ongoing scams for income, legal or not. They think it’s fine. They consider it normal, because it is, for now, right or wrong.
The crypto-strategy for profits is a marketing buzz. Let’s all get excited about making money in our pyramid scheme and see how far we can take it. See how long we can milk it with our strategical exuberance. The price will rise as promoted by corporate media celebrities and heavily invested news pundits.
Reality check.
Crypto is a scam. It’s the destination of the grand scam. Even though it’s not a currency, yet, it is quickly being accepted as payment at notable corporate retailers. The validity of the scam is being created by the establishment. Not because it’s needed but because it transcends main street, for investor profits.
Our money can be transacted digitally already. There’s no good purpose for a publicly sanctioned scam, even as a betting mechanism.
When the dollar fails, Crypto will be there to fulfill the transaction. Crypto is a Wall Street currency, not a Main Street currency. At least not yet.
Embracing an alternative currency is betraying the American dollar and by extension, America. If anything defines the United States it is its currency. To contract monetary authority to the Fed is outrageous in the first place, imo. But to allow them to create a privatized alternative to our legally sanctioned currency, so we can “invest” in it, is just wrong.
Crypto-currency is not a currency at all.
Maybe if we can get enough people to use our private currency, we can abandon the dollar completely, is what they want. We don’t need your stinking money, we have our own, is what they’re thinking.
I’ll be back to revise and extend this when I can. For now, I’ll leave this information below, I have extracted from the bitcoin currency market page. It says the investment has no underlying value, while trying to convince you that it does. And notice how they discount the dollar as being a fiat currency, as if the public’s money is as fraudulent as their own.
Update Dec 2021
At the same time Crypto is becoming more normalized and integrated into our economy, it is becoming more obvious how fraudulent the scam is. They’ll all say We told you so, and wash their hands of it. That how this “system” “works”. It reflects the intention of those who control the system design, legislating and adjudicating the scam to protect and defend their self-interests.
I was motivated, this Christmas eve, for a quick addendum here, after reading the linked article by Robert McCauley. Despite omitting the dark money-laundering functionality of the scam, this is the most honest analysis I’ve seen yet, explaining the mechanics of the legalized crime of the crypto scam.
Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency invented in 2008 by an unknown person or group of people using the name Satoshi Nakamoto. The currency began use in 2009 when its implementation was released as open-source software. Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency, without a central bank or single administrator, that can be sent from user to user on the peer-to-peer bitcoin network without the need for intermediaries. Transactions are verified by network nodes through cryptography and recorded in a public distributed ledger called a blockchain. Bitcoins are created as a reward for a process known as mining. They can be exchanged for other currencies, products, and services, but the real-world value of the coins is extremely volatile. Research produced by the University of Cambridge estimated that in 2017, there were 2.9 to 5.8 million unique users using a cryptocurrency wallet, most of them using bitcoin. Users choose to participate in the digital currency for a number of reasons: ideologies such as commitment to anarchism, decentralization and libertarianism, convenience, using the currency as an investment and pseudonymity of transactions. Wikipedia
About United States DollarThe United States dollar is the official currency of the United States and its territories per the Coinage Act of 1792. One dollar is divided into 100 cents, or into 1000 mills for accounting and taxation purposes. The Coinage Act of 1792 created a decimal currency by creating the dime, nickel, and penny coins, as well as the dollar, half dollar, and quarter dollar coins, all of which are still minted in 2021. Several forms of paper money were introduced by Congress over the years, the latest of which being the Federal Reserve Note that was authorized by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. While all existing U.S. currency remains legal tender, issuance of the previous form of the currency was discontinued in January 1971. As a result, paper money that is in current circulation consists primarily of Federal Reserve Notes that are denominated in U.S. dollars. Since the convertibility of paper U.S. currency into any precious metal was suspended in 1971, the U.S. dollar is de facto fiat money. Wikipedia
An objection is more powerful than a vote, apparently, in the senate.
Truth seeking is a time consuming endeavor when the truth is being hidden, institutionally, by almost everyone. That’s why I was happy to stumble across this Jimmy Dore video, where he points out Senator Bernie could have objected to the Trump agenda then, just as Senator Manchin, democrat, is objecting to the Biden agenda now.
Jimmy makes a good point but it needs further clarification.
One objection from a democratic senator against Trump would have changed the majority from 51 to 60, effectively defeating anything he wanted to do, and did, like his big tax cuts, his great wall, and his conservative court. His entire agenda could have been defeated by one senator objecting, but none did.
Trump confirmed three Supreme Court justices without objection. Any democratic senator could have forced a 60 vote threshold for those judicial confirmations but none did. All of the democrats voted against all of the nominees but none of them objected, apparently, so they were all confirmed. It’s a perfect example of self-sabotage by the democrats to serve the conservative agenda, by not reciprocating with the rules.
Everybody is blaming rule 22 and the need to close debate with a sixty vote threshold. It’s all because of an accidental rule change by Aaron Burr, they say, in 1806 and blah blah blah. That’s all a distraction.
I’ve been enjoying all of the misguided opinions about the filibuster and possibly shared a few of my own. It’s all a distraction from the main point, which is a supermajority of one is an intentional senate rule that violates the constitution. It’s absurd and illegal and it’s true.
Senate rule 8.1 is the problem in need of correction.
I knew one senator could object to anything from proceeding but I got distracted down a rabbit-hole of professional deception. I found myself wasting my time chasing down establishment disinformation to counterpoint. As seen in the three previous filibuster posts.
So I took another look at the senate rules and sure enough, one senator can object to consideration of just about anything, using rule eight.
RULE VIII ORDER OF BUSINESS .. bills and resolutions that are not objected to shall be taken up in their order, ..
Like most legalese, the language is up for interpretation and loopholes could be found to get around it. Alternative interpretations could allow bills to be debated and brought to a vote where majority rule prevails.
The rule could be interpreted to allow the chair to bring up the bill “later in the order” and declare that it proceeds directly to a majority vote, for instance. It’s all about interpretation.
But alas, the senate democrats don’t even have unity within their own caucus. Even though they have enough democratic senators they still don’t have a majority, which has been a Democratic Party problem for a long time. Despite preaching unity they are rarely united themselves, on much of anything.
The Democratic Party seem to always be just a few votes shy of victory, for the public. If the republicans can’t beat ‘um outright, then enough democrats will step forward to facilitate democratic failure.
If the republicans win a victory the public loses. If the democrats win a victory for the public, it’s because the republicans won as well.
Republicans don’t like voters.
The For the People voting rights will be a perfect example of intentional failure by democrats. If the Bill included a new computer server and a tech savvy staff in every congressional district, to facilitate electoral reform, it could be called infrastructure.
They can pass it with a majority vote, so says the parliamentarian, lol.
The democrats won’t likely include a citizen network into the infrastructure bill to revolutionize our democracy, that’s a bet. They will keep voting rights separate to ensure it fails, by rule. Just in case infrastructure passes, they’ll know meaningful voting rights won’t.
The states are all pushing voter suppression, they say.
The Democratic Party is full of double agents ready to conspire with republicans against the public, democracy, and the common good.
The filibuster is a perfect example of establishment collusion against the public. That includes both parties and virtually every organization that dispenses information. They all rationalize that the vauguely defined filibuster is a valid legal tactic despite characterizing it as derived from a legislative accident that ultimately violates constitutional intent.
The establishment says the filibuster supermajority is caused by the need to close debate. That is not true. The truth is senate rule 8.1 allows for an objection to proceed to the debate. That senate rule violates the majority rule intention of the constitution. If a senate rule obstructs constitutional intention, it’s illegal.
Senate Rule 8.1 needs to be rewritten for constitutional compliance:
RULE VIII ORDER OF BUSINESS .. bills and resolutions shall be taken up in their order, ..
And with that one rule change it would take 60 votes to obstruct, instead of 60 votes to proceed. A supermajority would be necessary to sustain an objection to proceeding, as the constitution intends.
So, it turns out the problem is not the senate filibuster after all.
It is Rule #8.1 that needs to be revised to make the senate procedure constitutionally compliant. Then, maybe it would be more difficult for the senate to obstruct policy that benefits the public.