August 2020 – Public Voter

Democracy Withers

We’ve come a long way through a slog of empty rhetoric to get to the brink of democratic failure. From Herbert Walker’s “a thousand points of light” to “let them eat light” or something like that, I heard Biden saying last night, as he accepted the nomination to challenge the incumbent madman, currently sprouting authoritarian roots in the White House.

Biden’s performance was near perfect but his promises rang a bit insincere, to my ears. That’s because I’ve heard it all before.

The duopoly shovel their slogans of hope and compassion out every election cycle and the public policies just keep getting worse and worse, for the public, even if the democrats win, I’ve noticed. I consider them a complete lapdog resistance at best. The democrats are accomplices in our unequal economy and complicit in our current social instability, to some degree or another.

The democrats just had their convention to nominate Joe. There was no live audience due to the virus so it was a little weird. It’s as if democracy has already been defeated and the resistance has been relegated to their basements, coordinating a series of infomercials to deliver their propaganda promises to the wind.

Still, it was a pretty slick production and very nicely done. Obama was keeping it real and Nancy was larger than life. She wears her place with grace in our history, like no other, imo, despite the empty rhetoric. Bernie nailed it as usual. Nobody tells it like it is better than him. It was a good cast and they all did well, imo, considering the circumstances. I enjoyed the show and generally like the democrats.

Now to the critique.

For context, don’t forget conspiracy is a hot topic. Qanon gets promoted on the news, daily, nearly every hour. They were discussing today how Trump would not denounce the group, as if they’re organic and autonomous. I also saw a number of examples of discrediting truth by associating it with lies, which I wrote about in the Q-Laid post.

It’s all a conspiracy and they’re all in on it.

I’m not going down that rabbit hole right now, but I will say what everybody thinks is our normal economy can be argued is actually a massive conspiracy. That is indeed what I have been arguing here for some time. There’s an open invitation in the forum to anybody who thinks they can argue this economy is not an ongoing conspiracy.

I noticed Obama mentioned conspiracies when he asked last night “what’s the point?” He then unloaded a healthy dose of what he calls the point. The point, he said, is that people get scammed by the rich because they don’t vote, correctly.

Parse that for a second and what you find is the ex president trying to absolve himself of the responsibility of the mess we’re now in. His comments imply that this downward trajectory towards a government functioning as an adversarial wealth extraction scam has nothing to do with him. It is the public’s fault, and not his. Wrong!

First of all, Obama attempts to demonize conspiracy theories, while missing the point that the democracy he is telling us to save is threatened by an adversary that is itself an ongoing conspiracy to destroy our democracy, from within. Hello?

Donald Trump is an inside job. That’s the point. The adversary is a conspiracy.

The Trump administration is an ongoing conspiracy to dismantle our government and cripple our democratic potential, while handing out borrowed money and waving the flag for votes.

And that’s a conspiracy, not a democracy.

The democrats could have built a national voting system in 2009 to protect our democracy, but no, they bailed out their bad investments instead. They chose to save their own looted booty rather than provide the public with an adequate electoral infrastructure. They could have done both, but they didn’t.

The truth is the public put Obama in charge for two terms and he served those he was elected to protect us from. The continuity of debt and extraction has been a bipartisan scam for decades. Obama was an accomplice in the conspiracy and he now has the audacity to blame the voters, who voted for him.

So the point is not that the public doesn’t vote correctly. The point is those who are elected betray their voters, for money, routinely. When Obama was elected the democrats controlled the entire government and they governed like republicans.

So don’t blame the voters, blame the democrats for not stepping up and doing what needed to be done when they had the chance to do it.. Betraying your constituency is another form of election fraud.

The Obama admin was a Wall Street Trojan horse.

Obama and the democrats bailed out the scammers, against public opinion, and didn’t bring the change the country desperately needed, so the public voted for the other guy, the supposed outsider. Anybody but the status quo, won.

We voted for the Wall Street Trump horse, so they say.

Now, ironically, The democrats are back with another Wall Street horse, to save us from the other Wall Street horse. Our election is a Wall Street horse race.

This is what happens when you vote for the lesser of two evils. Eventually the vote goes so low and the choice gets so evil that we are now supposedly voting on whether or not we want to vote anymore. That’s your choice, they say, democracy or not.

When the election is understood to be about democracy itself, as in, a vote for Trump is a vote against democracy, voting for the democrats is not a choice. When one of two choices is to forfeit your choice, you have no choice. That’s a conspiracy to deprive the public of democracy, and it’s working.

So the point Mr. Obama, is you can’t say that there’s no point in seeking the truth about conspiracies and then describe the government as a massive conspiracy working against the voters. The contradiction is self evident. Checkmate, sir.

Voters are right to be cynical.

Obama literally admits the government functions as an extraction scam, which is the truth, but then blames the voters, which is a lie. So his bias and deceptive intent should be acknowledged, along with his most excellent oratory skills, bravo. I loved the bit about the constitution.

Credit where credit is due, but notice he calls the scam a skew. The system is merely skewed, he says. It’s not a scam. It’s all nice and legal like, ya see. This is not a conspiracy. This skewering is normal. It’s by democratic design, because of your apathy.

So what’s the point? He says.

The question is do we want to live in a militaristic security state where the leaders lie to the people and dictate policy by decree, where soldiers with bad attitudes look for public problems to solve, problems that look like you, or someone you love.

The dems are promising the usual platitudes disguised as political solutions. When we’re talking about losing our democracy, all other issues should take a back seat. If by some chance the democrats ever control the government again I wouldn’t expect any meaningful democratic reforms. It’s not what they do. The dems reconcile republican excesses. That’s what they do.

I don’t want to get all hyperbolic here but I won’t be surprised at whatever happens during this election, and after. If you believe those who lost the last presidential election, the democrats, it sounds like they’re prepared to concede as necessary moving forward. Our democracy had a good run, they’ll say.

A battle of platitudes.

Joe Biden promises to build back better because Make America Great Again isn’t working out, apparently, for the democrats, even though their stocks are poised for a big Trump bump if Biden loses. Their conflict of interest is self evident. The party loyalists who professionally preach left wing gospel will prosper more if the right wingers win, which proves the fallacy of the current political spectrum.

That’s why I wasn’t surprised to see Joe reach his conciliatory rhetoric across the aisle and promise to work with the monsters threatening our democracy. He’s already promising to look forward and let the healing begin, as democrats always do after taking the White House.

Joey’s kissy face rhetoric shows the scammed do not have adequate representation. The democrats deprive the public of an honest and accurate representation based on the most important metric, money.

Democrats deny the reality that money is representation and that the economic pendulum has swung so far to the right in the last fifty years that the only acceptable response is a complete rejection of the policies that got us here.

The democrats need to take an ideological stand of corrective action. The simple fact that Biden didn’t have a piece of corrective legislation in his hand, endorsed by lawmakers and ready to debate in congress, is enough proof for me to know that democratic reforms are not a priority, for them.

If money is representation, and it is, the democrats have nothing to fear. It’s the uninvested taxpayers that pay the toll around here. They don’t have enough money to influence lawmakers to correct their never ending recession.

That’s why we need the apportionment act for a democratic upgrade. If we want to save our democracy, and we do, we need a government that reflects the current population and their economic diversity. Neither party does that. The lesser of two adversaries is stilll an adversary.

And that’s a conspiracy, not a democracy.

The Q Plan

The plan to save the world. This is a compelling infomercial by Q, I assume, explaining that the plot to scam us is not human nature. It’s a criminal conspiracy, he says.

First problem, nobody is anonymous here except the deep state. So I don’t trust Q already. So far, to me, this is a deep state op to identify and catalog those who disagree, for further psychometric testing of potential leftist sympathies. We know who you are.

For all I know this video is made by the deep state to further rub their smugness into your economic wounds, like salt, while they simultaneously trickle down overly generous compensation packages to the producers of their propaganda. I smell a ghost.

However, it is a slick video, and great title. Let’s watch more and see what the plan is to save the world. The video is certainly identifying some of the obvious symptoms of the problem. Let’s see what the solution is.

Okay, the first major flaw in the narrative happens at 3:57. The criminals did not use their media to set black against white. If anything the media reduced racism because a larger audience shamed the practice into near submission.

BS at 4:07 The media didn’t convince us to fight and destroy ourselves because of our differences. They have organized around division because we are divided. Division in the real world escalates for evermore profits and the media reflects the conflict. The quest for supremacy provokes hate, not the media. The media provides the rationalizations for those predisposed to fight.

Q is a church. lIke all other institutions if you do not pledge allegiance to them they won’t do anything for you.

4:21. The criminals popularized lifestyles, implies that too much freedom is a bad thing. The video is blaming the free market and free will for the reason we have broken homes.

Ok, we’re at 5:20. JFK was invoked, and accurately, and the viewer says, yes, that checks out, maybe I can trust the next sentence telling me Reagan was also a good guy.

Stop!

I had to hit pause right there because the rabbit hole has just been opened. Let’s see where this goes. Bush charged Reagan with voodoo economics. Just because Bush was guilty doesn’t mean Reagan wasn’t.

Iran Contra ring any bells?

What’s the point of trying to separate Reagan and Bush? Why save Reagan at the expense of your credibility? Let’s see what else they got.

Every president after Reagan is the deep state he says. I’m curious why the cutoff. It’s probably the demographic of the audience, not the history. The deep state has been in high gear forever. Why the cutoff after Reagan?

The world declined into darkness, do you need me to tell you how? He says. Then starts listing the symptoms of free market capitalism and the conflict-based economy.

Ok, here comes the solution. It’s just a change of personnel it turns out, that’s all we needed all along. We just need people who aren’t evil running our government. It’s that simple, we’re supposed to believe.

This is where things start to get better, he says, hold on to your proverbial hat. Let’s hear him out.

8:40 We’re going to expose the criminals for what they are, you say, and then you use Weinstein and Spacey as your villains, to imply Q will bring justice to sex predators. I’ll let that go as a bad edit but implying your good guy generals are going to save us from the democrats is just stupid. It’s partisan dribble.

We don’t really have a policy idea. We just need to hook up with authoritarians to wage war on people to save us from the others, especially those who inappropriately violate proper sexual etiquette, I believe he just said.

This is deep state propaganda. I have no doubt at 8:41 let’s continue.

The next sixty seconds the plan comes together, they are going to win the white house and defeat the democrats who hate America. That is an insult to intelligence and a call to partisan loyalty at the same time.

So if anybody hasn’t figured out the plan yet, spoiler alert!

The plan is to not vacate the White House. He’ll say sorry, but I’m not leaving. I’ll be writing your history books now with me starring as the great hero. If there’s a problem with that, take me to court.

So the mission of the Q is to help normalize the plan. The plan where the constitution is ultimately retired and everybody is cool with that, based on their allegiance to the plan, the plan they don’t yet understand.

9:30 Ok, All evidence shows peace is returning and the good guys are winning the war, he says, while his hero president dominates liberal cities with authoritarian provocations.

Ok, fellow slaves, he says the problem was the criminals had too much power, yet his only political solution is to arrest and punish those who have done very bad things.

He’s talking about punishing people you love for something he says he knows and you don’t. You don’t see a problem with that mister non-existent counterpoint? I do.

This plan has no political solutions at all. The plan to save the world is to arrest the political opposition and justify it by calling them powerful criminals and child molesters.

Deep State Q-laid

I consider Qanon the cutting edge tension in our overly-sensationalized and adrenalized, hyper-partisan society. Is that a compliment?

How can a group of crazy conspiracists become so popular?

I have included a couple of full length news segments in this video without edit to show the extent of the corporate production values used to promote this right wing lunatic fringe movement, as news.

This topic proves the ringmaster of our national circus is money.

Massive grassroots industries of conspiracy were motivated for truth about the JFK and 911 conspiracies, but were blacklisted as persona-non-grata by corporate media. Comparatively, news about Qanon and their crazy allegations are in constant broadcast rotation. Their marketshare is rising faster than rock star stocks at a taxpayer bailout party.

The synergy and collusion of corporate sponsorship of Qanon is self-evident, yet its purpose is still murky and confusing, for some.

To help understand the deep state conspiracy, consider that the government has been overthrown by a coalition of special interest groups, foreign and domestic, called the deep state..

Qanon works for them. The loyalty is to the deep state. If Q calls it the Cabal. Q serves the Cabal.

I don’t believe the Q narrative to be true.

Covert intentions manipulate our corridors of power and public policy for deep state self interest. That’s the problem. A political solution is an overt plan of democratic action to correct the problem.

Political problem versus political solution.

There are at least two sides doing battle for control of our divided government. There is the corrupt on one side and the confused on the other, imo.

The corrupt have been recruiting the confused for a very long time. The balance is heavily skewed now because money is plentiful. The corrupt have monopolized our government and the confused are rewarded to concede their resistance, which they do, to the republicans.

Better confused than corrupt is what a good democrat would say.

Both parties have neglected the truth in service to the deep state.

Funny how conspiracy theories are partisan. The left blames the right and the right blames the left and together they just never seem to figure out how to find the truth.

We’ll never know, they say.

So move along. Nothing to see here.

Then you hear a nonpartisan murmur that reminds you, “it was the deep state”. Oh yes, that’s right. It was the deep state, right?

Check your perimeter before proceeding;

The deep state killed JFK. The story goes.

Once your group kills the president of the most powerful nation on earth, you don’t sit back and say, oh, glad that’s over with. No way, every decision you make from then on must be to serve the overthrow and protect the conspiracy.

Failure of democracy would be success for the conspiracy.

If the deep state controlled the government, what would they do? I’m sure it would be the same as what was done, and what is still being done.

Our government shipped our jobs overseas, imported foreign labor, and created massive inequality. They started an endless war economy for investor profits and maximized our public debt.

What else would you do?

They hired an army of propaganda professionals to preach the lone gunman theory and the magic bullet theory on prime time, while demonizing counterpoints of testimony and logic, as conspiracy theory for decades.

The official theory is a ridiculous theory that collapses quickly with an honest look. Willful ignorance and official denial provide a thin veil of doubt for those who prefer to remain unsure.

Our economy has been captured, and it is being extracted by the deep state. The deep state is the monolithic conspiracy that JFK warned about. They have an army of flag-less mercenaries loyal to their paychecks ready to deploy as necessary, to sow chaos at home and abroad, wherever it might be needed.

The deep state is a globalized coalition of corrupt corporations and privatized fascist power. They control the government and extract wealth from the public. They prevent democratic reforms and representative government.

But business is good in crazy town. Take a deep breath before you put your head down this rabbit hole. I just got back. I had to come up for air. I saw enough to know I saw enough. I get it.

Sorry to say, but I have concluded that this Q thing is the craziest bunch of psycho stink you could ever smell.

If thoughts had aroma, this stuff would be putrid.

The Q “conspiracy” is an insult to conspiracy. Q is a tactic to discredit conspiracy, and make a mockery of truth seeking. It’s a scam.

Q: Why is this conspiracy so popular?

A: Qanon in a way, is like the modern day equivalent of the old Enquirer magazine. They discredit information by association. If they publish something, you know it’s not true. Which is deceptive, but fun.

You can discredit an article about corruption by surrounding it with UFO articles, which you might have done, or do, if you were corrupt and owned a newspaper.

The “unofficial” JFK assassination investigations were discredited for decades, as conspiracy, published next to stories about alien abductions and Elvis sightings, and a little boy with bat ears.

Back then, the news hour shows would tease assassination stories for maximum commercial impact. We would wait for an hour and then they would run a thirty second blurb of irrelevant drama at the end of the show.

Whatever the info was it could always be dismissed with the wave of an official hand. Or willful ignorance was popular and effective back then too, as it is now.

The same tactics are still used to discredit “theories” that diverge from the official “version” of political crimes. This way “officials” don’t have to be accountable for their complicity, wether it be by guilt or ignorance, as they grandfather in their inherited cover-up stories, as implausible as they might be.

The status quo defends the official theories, even if untrue.

Conspiracies become theories when the official investigation is inadequate. This would naturally happen if officials were guilty of the underlying crime, or protecting their own complicity by obstructing investigations to prevent justice.

Conspiracies happen. Obstruction causes theories.

Demonizing conspiracy is an obstruction tactic to rubber stamp an establishment sanctioned cover-up.

Without a reliable consensus system, the only dissenting voice the public has is by marching in the streets, to protest the decisions of those they have elected to represent them.

Eventually the public concedes in protest fatigue. They become unrepresented and victimized by those they vote for, those who create the policy that increases the inequality and injustice. The public is then compelled to protest again and again.

By my understanding, Q is not protesting anything. Together with their mainstream brethren in the propaganda industry, they actually demonize conspiracy and minimize the importance of the truth. They are not about to protest the conflict-based economy, they are here to protect it.

Q is the opposite of their claims.

Straw man conspiracy theories are concocted to be easily refuted in order to discredit other conspiracies by association.

False equivalency

An example would be discrediting birtherism, with an argument, and then casually throw the truth movement into your imaginary ‘defeated’ pile without debate.

Presumptuous and arrogant tool comes to mind. I don’t want to be too judgmental but conspiracy theories are not created equal and should not be treated as such by credible people.

The tv people use the same tactics routinely, to pretend they have debunked an unofficial conspiracy theory, when they haven’t.

Another bad tactic is blaming the news consumers for their lack of faith in an official theory as being a personal flaw. What a totally twisted self-serving logic. As if there’s no conspiracy simply because we need there to be one, for peace of mind, they say, while ignoring the questions that might lead to the truth and the metaphorical smoking gun in their hand.

Notice how Farheed gains “official” credibility by discrediting the obviously fictional beliefs of Qanon. Now you can trust him when he starts lying to you on his conspiracy show. That’d be propaganda. 95% proof, I mean truth. He says, “look over here”, at the straw-man and everybody does.

The crazy straw man conspiracy theories are easily debunked to give pundits credibility, to convince you that they don’t work for the conspirators, while testifying to the validity of their “official” theories.

Deceptive propaganda distracts you from the main point and from coming to the right conclusion. You will agree with everything presented and then assume the conclusion must also be correct, when it’s not.

The propaganda is designed to persuade you to act against your own best interest. For example, the guilty arresting a patsy to take the blame. You consider the case closed, though the convicted was “framed”.

Those who hide evidence that would lead to the truth are also guilty or complicit of the underlying crime. History shows the motive for obstruction of justice is to hide guilt, which will become a conspiracy theory if it is the authority that obstructs the investigation.

Authority does not deserve the benefit of the doubt, anymore. That’s how we got to the point of Qanon and conspiracy trivialization. That’s how Qanon is an authority, or not, depending what you believe.

Now, in the Q narrative, we are to believe, or not, that a spook with high level security clearance is leaking clues to his “followers”.

We are to believe that this is a deep state mole and betrayal conspiracy narrative, as opposed to Q being a tool in a deep state operation, serving its partisan purposes, as usual.

The deep state can’t stop the Q? I’m so sure. Not credible. This is a deep state conspiracy synergistically promoted through the media to normalize the lunacy on our path to the national demise.

Qanon followers seek the truth, supposedly, yet somehow they can’t seem to find it. So, they’ll just believe a bunch of idiotic nonsense, supposedly. They are an intellectual nuisance to the truth and yet still get a free ride on the cable news propaganda train, like some kind of elitist hobos of disinformation, spreading their seeds of deception to grow among the gullible masses.

I don’t need any more proof to know that they are an un-organic movement with an ulterior motive, which is to discredit the truth.

They pretend to be non-partisan but they are republicans in service to the ideological division and the economic injustice.

The main fallacy of the Q narrative, by pundits left and right, is to suggest that Trump is a rouge populist and not the continuation of previous republican administration agendas, which he is, and so is Qanon. The continuity of the division has been relentless.

The resistance has been irrelevant.

A lot of people believe Q, apparently, despite the blatant lies and ridiculous predictions. They believe, not because the lies are plausible but, as an act of faith, in allegiance against their common adversaries.

Choose your slur here.

The enemy is simplistically labeled as socialists, leftists, democrats, and the like, by their leader, our president, and branded as child molesters by his unfiltered followers, the deep state shills pretending to be non-partisan patriots.

Qanon is institutionalized Academentia, magnified to cartoonish absurdity in an attempt to normalize the mockery of the truth, and to diminish its significance in our society.

Qanon is not seeking the truth. They are seeking those who know the truth. The truth is Qanon are mercenary spies in a socially subsidized honey pot operation, commissioned by the deep state to prevent the so-called socialists from influencing policy.

Antifa is Q’s mercenary enemy in this narrative. Antifa is simply a different department in the same haunted house of spooks and spies, concocted for battle, like political parties, but designated nonpartisan to comply with the Hatch act.

The alleged ideological enemies are preparing to convene for violence, for the cameras. Like actors on a little set, they assemble to escalate the conflict for broadcast. That’s what they’re paid to do, perform the violence for the narrative.

You start to see how this conflict is being concocted, by nurturing the divisions of idiotic ideologies and investing in conflict in order to perpetuate the privileged industries of an obsolete economy.

This economy is designed for conflict and extraction.

The public will fight because our economy is designed to profit investors when we do. Our public policy is controlled by investors who profit from conflict and debt. The more we fight the more we spend. The more we spend the more they make.

Conflict causes inequality.

The workers and the fighters bust their ass. We spend our hard earned money on fighting each other so investors can profit from our blood and toil. It’s an extraction scam that should be corrected.

That is the conflict-based economy.

The Q-laid crew are here to oppose those who oppose conflict-based profits. The conflict-based economy feeds on the violence for growth, so violence will be provoked, for profits, by the professionals, like Q.

The people of the world are emerging from the dark ages due to the digital revolution. We can now see globally and historically and do it instantly, if we want. If one cares to look, it’s easy to see how messed up the people of this planet have been, and still are.

We need a democratic upgrade. This place is so frantically antidemocratic, we don’t even have the software yet, for consensus, let alone the need to upgrade it.

Think about it.

Now is the time to utilize technology for democracy instead of extraction. Now is the time to redesign our economy to provide the citizenry with universal guarantees worthy of a modern day democratic republic. Now is the time.

Liberation is more affordable than oppression, for the taxpayers.

And for the conflict mongering Q-balls out there.

The JFK assassination was investigated by the guy that JFK had just fired. What else do you need to know? The truth is out there if anybody cares to look, most don’t.

There’s a fine line between a trump supporter and a Q-laid drinker. After you drink the Q-laid the truth can only be a quest, it’s never a conclusion. That way you can believe anything you want and fit right in with Qanon, as long as you have faith in their plan.

Their truth is still pending…

Here’s some clue drops for all you Q-tards out there. The enemy is a what, not a who. It doesn’t matter who the enemy is. The result is the same and so is the remedy. The enemy is corruption and the remedy is democracy. Your quest is to understand that in order to put the truth into context, just in case you find some.

We need a government to correct the corruption, not protect it.

Resistance to a better democracy is corruption.

The political challenge the public faces, to save its democracy, is not in the streets. It’s in the plan. And the apportionment act is a political plan that can create a democracy for the public, at long last.

To create a democracy or not, is the question that should be on the table. That’s the choice. Rounding up leftists to fulfill an apocalyptic authoritarian zombie fantasy is not on the table, though duly noted as your preference.

Q is against democracy.

Marching around against a bunch of conspiracy crap is a marketing ploy. It’s not a protest at all. They incite violence at protests. That’s what Q is doing, tainting peaceful protests so they can be reported as violent.

Q is obviously a corporate product, like the tea-tards, but with cooler graphics and a more sensationalistic grievance. It’s all the same, just a little more crazy and dangerous to keep up with the narrative.

Qanon mocks protest. Qanon mocks the truth.

The true Qanon motive goes unchallenged on corporate news. As if they are just the next cutting edge of free market cynicism to be monetized. They are the commercially acceptable anarchists of conspiracy, come to help officials demonize the unofficial truth as crazy, meaningless, and irrelevant. News at 11. They’ll tell you all about it.

It is being reported that Amazon is supposedly “inadvertently” providing featured status to their Q book. And then Twitter bans Q accounts in a publicity stunt to further promote their artificially inflated numbers, and “message”. The privileged presence exposes their allegiance and subservience to their corporate “deep state” overlords.

The deep state corporate media news pundits will be keeping us overly-informed about the groups antics and recruitment strategies moving forward, I’m sure. We’ll be seeing a lot more of them. Because they are the same, even if they don’t understand how.

Q is a deep state ploy. It is not an organic movement of like-minded people attempting to do something constructive. It is the institutional farming of angry pawns who are mad at the government, and rightly so, and the cable news narrative which is written to profit from conflict.

The plan seems to be working.

I am not going to dignify the Q theories with further comment, except to say some of it is professionally thoughtful entertainment, as all good fiction is. I consumed enough to know it is not a quest for the truth or a battle with the deep state from within the deep state.

Q is a nefarious deep state plot.

Amazon and Wall Street are the global deep state. They are the economy created for investors to maximize the extraction of workers. It is a deep state economic design based on exploitation and taxpayer extraction, for some, to create wealth for others.

That is the conflict-based economy. It needs to change.

Q represents Top Secret America run amuck. They are what president Eisenhower warned us about, speaking of the military industrial complex. They are a vast network of contractors paid to prevent exactly what they are. They are a mercenary organization that undermines truth, justice, and democracy, and the rule of law, and apple pie too, probably. They should be recognized for what they are, servants of fascism, and undeniably dangerous to democracy and the rule of law.

I’m not done with Q. Their meteoric rise to infamy is just beginning. I saw report of a scuffle at a protest and the camera zooms in on this super cool sniper Q logo on the back of some guys jacket. I saw the clue and for moment I almost felt like I was part of the team, how fun!

Except it’s not.

Q represents the commercialization of the coming lawlessness. Qanon is the normalization of the banana republic syndrome where hooligans are here to help enforce law and order, but provoke violence, for money, pretending to be patriots, if you know what I mean.

————–

If you seek the truth to better understand current events and the divisions increasing in our society consider the following;

The struggle of humanity is toward either an organization by corruption or representation by democracy.

We should assume that corruption has infiltrated nearly every aspect of our government. It is our normal. Just because you don’t see it doesn’t mean it’s not there.

The public is adversely influenced by propaganda, as well, that normalizes our current socioeconomic scam as being acceptable, when it’s not. It never was.

The system itself is designed for the dark ages, or at best the Cold War. It’s totally out of date with protests increasing as fast as the inequality, with the homeless population about to explode.

Anyway, consider China and Russia, are trending very undemocratic, as are we, especially the republicans. We need to reverse that trend here for ourselves before we can preach democracy abroad.

The democrats are the only hope of resistance to the globalist authoritarian trend. They are clearly the lesser of two evils so given that’s the only choice, the choice is simple.

If we educate democrats to advocate for a new apportionment act to update our democracy for a more representative government, eventually democrats can succeed, maybe even with bipartisan support.

Currently the republicans are shamelessly allied economically with the adversaries of democracy. They are the opposition. They have no allegiance to democracy, at all. At least not now.

Consider the democrats have split allegiances, as do we all. But we don’t make public policy. We should expect all democrats to better understand the struggle of humanity and the importance of democracy, and vote accordingly. We should expect they would all prefer to cede some legislative percentage to a larger delegation than to see democracy neutered by an imperial authority.

The era of the “moderate” democrats should be ended, imo. Democrats need to step up and acknowledge that money is representation and representatives should be apportioned accordingly. It’s the least they can do, for adequate reform.

As the understanding of the plan to reform democracy spreads the democrats will grow along with expectations that will eventually manifest as legislation and an economically representative government.

And a final thought about the video post. I must thank Van Helsing, for the images and sound. They are one of my favorite moods for the horror story of our forgotten history, as reported, past and present.

Tyranny

Funny thing about government is their proclamations of law are meaningless unless they control the authority necessary to enforce them.

What if Trump loses and refuses to vacate the premises?

Why would Trump leave the White House even if he lost? Who are the democrats gonna call? The ghost busters? Or their stock brokers?

Are the democrats going to call their deep state allies to escort the defeated squatter from the White House? By force? While he’s surrounded by his team of authoritarian lawyers threatening personal repercussions against everybody?

Not likely.

Should we expect a stand-off and a shoot-out?

If we continue with the same plot line that got us to this point, on the path to tyranny, we should expect the dems to protest and concede. Without an enforcement agency that’s all they can do.

Fascism and enforcement are synonymous. Trump and the Republican Party are the fascists. They are the enforcement. They can dictate the policy. The democrats will comply.

We have reached a point of puppetry and cartoonish plot lines with this narrative. Our electoral system is antiquated because elected officials prevent the democratic reforms necessary to correct the problem.

The dysfunction has been intentional and the result was predictable. As if constraining the “system” to institutional prosperity and trickle down economics wasn’t going to backfire someday, in extreme divisions of nepotistic inequality, rivaling monarchial royalty.

Tyranny will be rubber-stamped by a partisan court. The democrats will rely on the opinion of the “branch” that stole the election from VP Gore and anointed king GW. What choice do they have?

Partisan lawyers will defend the theft of our lawful representation, just like they rationalized torture to be legal, or slavery. That’s what they get paid for. That’s why they get the big bucks.

Nobody will believe them but nobody can stop them. They will dictate policy, because they can. They control the enforcement. When democracy has been corrupted for special interest purposes those who control the government can dictate the policy.

“Amazing” the media pundits will say, “Can you believe it?” Turns out we’re not a democracy after all. Or we are, it’s just tied up in the court right now. So we’ll have to wait and see what happens, they’ll say, reporting on the undeclared coup.

We can always go back to a democracy, someday, they’ll say, as they narrate the national demise. I can predict the rationalizations already.

“Democracy can be messy.”

It wasn’t really a democracy anyway, so we’re not really losing that much, they’ll say. Looters don’t deserve to vote, or, “They don’t even know what they’re protesting.”

“Stop complaining”, they’ll say. “You deserved it.”

Timothy Snyder has written a couple of books to help understand the transition to a tyrannical form of government. I recommend buying them if you want to follow along, looking for clues.

If there is a better political solution to tyranny than restoring the middle class with an income-based apportionment act, I would love to see it.

Otherwise we’ll assume you prefer tyranny.

I think enough counterfeiting and bribery has gone on here that the majority of voters will vote to do away with voting. At least they’ll report it that way. It’s no big deal, they’ll say you said.

Democracy is a big deal.

The resistance to tyranny succeeds when the enforcement authority is controlled by a representative government, elected democratically.

When a special interest organization controls the government for its own purposes, don’t be surprised when they use their enforcement authority against the public to preserve that authority.

We are at the crossroads to tyranny. Either we will upgrade our democracy to achieve a more representative government or we will submit to tyranny.

The ability to achieve a verifiable and accessible voting system is long overdue. Not having one is the reason we have a dysfunctional democracy, and why we have a president Trump reserving judgement on the validity of our electoral results.

The electoral system is intentionally inadequate. It will be easy to argue the results are based on faith, because they are. It’s long past due to fix our democracy.

The remedy for tyranny is democracy.